Daily Archives: November 27, 2010

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6AP00D20101126 http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2005/may/19/thisweekssciencequestions.climatechange    

Some confusing communications have been released this week from the Met Office. The reason they are confusing is because we are not educated enough to understand them, but I will attempt to explain them here. The area in red above … Continue reading →

http://www.woodfortrees.org/ The red line represents the HadCRUT global cooling trend over the last decade (1/1/2001 – 10/31/2010.) The green line represents GISS. “There’s a very clear warming trend but it’s not as rapid as it was before,” Pope told reporters yesterday in … Continue reading →

recent results from the Met Office do show that there is a detectable human impact in the long-term decline in sea ice over the past 30 years, and all the evidence points to a complete loss of summer sea ice … Continue reading →

Five goals. I particularly liked the assist he took from Chimbonda.

Normally, Arctic sea ice extent surpasses Antarctic extent in early December, but it isn’t going to happen this year. Antarctic ice is 1.7 million km² above normal, and Arctic ice is below normal by the same amount. Based on current … Continue reading →

http://www.remss.com/msu/msu_data_monthly.html At present, no one other than GISS claims 2010 is the hottest year ever. The Met Office has announced their intentions to “adjust” their data in order to make 2010 (possibly) #1, but it hasn’t happened yet. The other … Continue reading →

Blue area shows ice excess since August 1. On average, there have been more than 640,000 km^2 (10,000 Manhattans) of excess ice. Peter Sinclair claimed in his hack attack piece that the excess does not occur when the sun is … Continue reading →

Update – new terrorist added today! One of the people pictured below is not a terrorist. Can you find that person?

http://www.kmjnow.com/ Yes it is real – and it has little or nothing to do with CO2. Repeating the obvious over and over again doesn’t change the facts.