Guardian Turns Logic Upside Down

China’s carbon emissions could be nearly 20% higher than previously thought, a new analysis of official Chinese data showed on Sunday, suggesting the pace of global climate change could be even faster than currently predicted.

Climate change rate could be faster than thought, study suggests | Environment | guardian.co.uk

These morons are incapable of distinguishing between CO2 and climate – possibly the stupidest group of people in human history.

A more sensible interpretation is : despite rapidly rising CO2 emissions (above scenario A) global temperatures have been constant for 15 years. This indicates that CO2 sensitivity is zero, and James Hansen needs to be retired.

About these ads

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Guardian Turns Logic Upside Down

  1. ArndB says:

    Only retirement is not enough. James Hansen and his AWG colleagues should be made repaying the salary and research money they have got, but grossly misused for ‚ideologically motivated’ research.

  2. hannuko says:

    It’s not about how much CO2 is in the atmosphere, it’s all about how much climate sin we commit.

  3. Dave N says:

    Astounding logic (or should I say illogic). They don’t even think for one minute about what they’re writing, and what it means. Actually, maybe they do; they’re just incapable of coming to the correct conclusion.

    • Greg says:

      I assume this just means another adjustment to the temperature record. Make the past even colder, and the present even warmer to match the CO2 increase.

    • leftinbrooklyn says:

      Naw, I think they’re capable of seeing the correct conclusion—they’re incapable of acknowledging the correct conclusion…That would be like asking a priest to say that god is dead…

  4. cb says:

    Lying is not being stupid. Lying is not being illogical. Lying is lying.

    The hippies have been told, very many times, how where and why they are incorrect. Despite all that, they continue onwards, brushing aside all else. What that obviously is, is dishonesty. With a little bit more brain-celling, one comes to realize that dishonesty is, at its root, lying. Hence, they are liars… because they tell lies whenever they speak.

    Many people genuinely are not very bright: to conflate their honest lack of comprehension with the foul corruption that is hippie-ness, is either an act of evil, or borderline so.

    Hippies take great delight in equating low IQ with RAW EVIL: you should do better, Stephen.

  5. Olaf Koenders says:

    The full-stupid James Hansen needs to be jailed, period. Guardian et. al need to be held to account also..

  6. DirkH says:

    I think the leftists, Greenpeace and warmist scientists have conditioned each other so much that mentioning CO2 and Climate Change in the same sentence suffices to create a “The End Is Nigh” reflex. They are no more capable of applying logic, if they ever were.

  7. “Uh, no see, when you put Crabno into the air, it takes . . . uh . . . like 20 years to absorb the heat, & like you can’t take that chance, man!”

  8. Michael says:

    My concern is of a different nature. At 350 ppm of atmospheric CO2 I had dark hair. Now it’s gray. I’m staying out of greenhouses, I don’t want it to turn white!

  9. Bruce says:

    Watch out, Steve, you’re getting more competition. The Guardian said overnight that it intends (eventually) to turn itself into a blog. Irony has its own logic.

    Guardian Media Group sees losses widen on US expansion

  10. Not sure what the relevance here is to China. We measure global CO2 and we know what this is. What particular countries emit or “hide” is a separate issue. CO2 in ppm is actually lower now than certain estimates made 20+ years ago, which seem to have underestimated the rate of emission increases. Speculatively this may be because CO2 residency time has been overestimated.

  11. Darrylb says:

    There junk is worse then aforementioned. They talk of CO2 and then show a hazy picture giving the impression that CO2 is somehow a visible, toxic pollutant

  12. Darrylb says:

    Err ah THEIR junk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s