No Criminal Is Stupid Enough To Risk This Fate

About these ads

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

31 Responses to No Criminal Is Stupid Enough To Risk This Fate

  1. David Appell says:

    Where is the proof of your claim that guns “deter tens of millions of potential crimes every year?”

    • Are you really as stupid as you pretend to be?

      • I’m afraid he is. He doesn’t understand why law enforcement and security guards carry millions of firearms around in the US, as there is no evidence they have deterrent effect (in his mind).

      • Ivan says:

        Even more so, I suspect.
        When his parents get home and find out that he has been using their computer, they are going to be very, very, upset with him.

      • David Appell says:

        Yet again: Where is the proof of your claim that guns “deter tens of millions of potential crimes every year?”

      • Why does law enforcement and security guards carry guns Appell if you fervently believe they have no deterrent effect?

      • David Appell says:

        I just want to know: Where is the proof of the claim that guns “deter tens of millions of potential crimes every year?”

      • David, I don’t know what drugs you are taking, but you have made the same post about 15 times, and have gone extremely far into the world of spam.

      • David Appell says:

        Because there are already far too many guns in society.

        Where is the proof of your claim that guns “deter tens of millions of potential crimes every year?”

        [David has been sent to SPAM]

      • Will you answer the question I asked you, yes or no?

        Ignoring a rebuttal by repeating your question doesn’t mean you’re winning the argument. It means you’re a moron. Are you going to argue why the rebuttal is wrong or are you are just going to continue to pretend there is no rebuttal?

      • I wanted Appell to answer the question as to why security guards who transport money, etc., carry guns, if they have no deterrent effect?

      • David Appell says:

        Security guards have to carry guns because there are so many guns in circulation.

        Which just proves the degree of the problem.

        [Snip SPAM]

      • The Journal News just hired armed guards. David Gregory’s kids attend a school with multiple armed guards. Every money transfer in Mexico involves at least three armed guards.

      • “Security guards have to carry guns because there are so many guns in circulation.”

        Your claim – which you have spammed here multiple times – was that guns were not a deterrent. Your reply now contradicts your claim because you are now asserting they are a deterrent.

    • savebyj says:

      The proof is that in 6 thousand years of human history we are the only standing world power that its people have remained a relatively free society from tyrannical jackasses like you.

      Your basic premise is that if you somehow could magically make weapons disappear then there would be less violence. This completely ignores six thousand years of known history. Man has been proven without a shadow of doubt to have the capacity to perform great feats of evil. Only sociopaths will debate this fact.

      So which is it David? Either you are completely ignorant of human history or you have the desire for your neighbor to be completely defenseless to either the designs of government or yourself. You either want justice to prevail and the designs of evil wicked men to be thwarted or you want people to be defenseless and evil to rule.

      If you think that there are too many guns in circulation then I have a good idea where you stand. It sounds like your desire is for evil wicked men to prosper and for good men to be defenseless against them.

      Which makes you evil.

    • sunsettommy says:

      Typical unhinged PHD holder who was answered several times but he wants the exact number before he is satisfied which is impossible because he is too over educated to realize that what I have known for over 15 years is that several million gun based crime control actions by citizens are done EACH YEAR to stop a would be rapist,assault,theft and more.

      The excited PHD boy fails to realize that ALL of the mass murders are done in gun free zones and that the shooter is always shown to have drug or mental problems.It is
      NEVER the sane citizen doing it and even a NRA member is not the cause of a single case.

      When are you going to chose reality over emotionalism when you think about “gun control”?

  2. Ivan says:

    In case you need more proof that this does happen (other than the above rant, that is) – here it is:
    Britain’s worst midwife: She drops a baby on its head
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2129023/Britains-worst-midwife-She-drops-baby-head-nearly-electrocutes-mother-birthing-pool-plugging-monitor-mains.html

  3. Me says:

    Toshinmack, is bobbing fer Appells again and comming up empty! :lol:

  4. bkivey says:

    That’s gun control I can get behind.

  5. Me says:

    I wonder if Toshinmack is worried about the smoke that the dragons breath caused. :lol:

  6. Me says:

    Here is what your military has.

  7. David, UK says:

    David Appell says:
    January 5, 2013 at 5:29 am

    [Security guards need guns b]ecause there are already far too many guns in society.

    Indeed. So the answer is obviously to ban guns, following which the criminals will be utterly compelled to hand over all their weapons. Then the streets, banks and school-kiddies will be safe, and there will be no more need for armed security guards. Armed security guards will become a rare and exciting event. Children just aren’t going to know what armed security guards are.

    I don’t see a flaw in the argument. [/sarc]

  8. mwhite says:

    “No Criminal Is Stupid Enough To Risk This Fate”

    http://americasdumbestcriminals.com/

    There’ll always be one

  9. oeman50 says:

    Guess what they are doing to protect the children from Sandy Hook that are now going to a new school? They have armed guards protecting them, just like that “insane” LaPierre recommended. Hmmmm. Who’s insane now?

  10. Pathway says:

    The Second Amendment is in place to protect the citizen from the Government. All other discourse about gun control is irrelevant.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s