I think that is a good idea.
It would keep all the whack jobs in one place so that it is easier to keep an eye on what they are doing.
The other thing, of course, is that the more “100-watt-bulbs” you put in the same room, the less chance there is of them actually agreeing on anything.
Was 2004 our worst 2 choices for President? Of course, 2000 wasn’t so wonderful, or 1988 or 1992. There have been a lot of vintage years for that distinction.
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/05/paul-krugman-obama-treasury-secretary
Remember these gems? –
Krugman 1-8-11 on Tuscon massacre: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/08/assassination-attempt-in-arizona/
Krugman 1-9-11 on Tuscon massacre: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/10/opinion/10krugman.html
Let’s make Al Gore head of the EPA while we’re at it – fill the Obama administration with Nobel Prize winners to keep Obama company.
Oh man….don’t give the buffoon any ideas!
I think that is a good idea.
It would keep all the whack jobs in one place so that it is easier to keep an eye on what they are doing.
The other thing, of course, is that the more “100-watt-bulbs” you put in the same room, the less chance there is of them actually agreeing on anything.
Was 2004 our worst 2 choices for President? Of course, 2000 wasn’t so wonderful, or 1988 or 1992. There have been a lot of vintage years for that distinction.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.