Katherine Hayhoe Outlines The Stupidity And Corruption Of Her Friends And Colleagues

The Hayhoe argument goes – we are all stupid and/or corrupt, so you must trust us.

ScreenHunter_157 Jan. 15 13.31

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

The reality is that there is virtually no debate among climate scientists on the following points: 1. The earth is warming. 2. The main cause for this warming is the increasing production of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases from human activities. 3. The impacts of climate change are already occurring, and will become more severe and even potentially dangerous the longer we allow this problem to continue unchecked. Yes, scientists love to argue. We could argue for years over the impact of soot particles on cloud formation, or the pathway that Atlantic hurricanes might follow in a warmer world. But those who actually study the earth, and study climate, are not arguing over the reality of this issue. That debate was settled many decades ago. The evidence is overwhelming. Climate change is real.

Q&A: Katharine Hayhoe on the trials of being a Christian climatologist | San Marcos Mercury | Local News from San Marcos and Hays County, Texas

About these ads

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Katherine Hayhoe Outlines The Stupidity And Corruption Of Her Friends And Colleagues

  1. gator69 says:

    “That debate was settled many decades ago.”

    Many 1: consisting of or amounting to a large but indefinite number

    When was the debate settled sweety?

  2. Justa Joe says:

    I guess Richard Lindzen doesn’t count. Ms, Kathy has put the case to bed.

    • tckev says:

      Or Roy Spencer, or Dr. Tim Ball, or Judith Curry, or Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt, or William Kininmonth, or Robert M. Carter, Ph.D, Ph. D., or Joe D’Aleo, PhD, or Dr. Benny Peiser, or Svend Hendriksen, or Dr. William Cotton, or Chris De Freitas, or….

  3. Pathway says:

    Climate change is real. It has been happening for 4,540,000,000 years.

  4. When was a debate allowed?

  5. Andy DC says:

    Since non believers were never allowed to participate in the process, peer review is just a circle jerk among true believers. Not exactly the scientific method.

  6. Rosco says:

    For decades Engineers have been looking for ways to improve thermal efficiency for a whole swag of engines and turbines – all the while “heat trapping gases” have been available to them to achieve this nirvana.

    If only they’d listened to climate scientists the world could have significantly improved fuel efficiency decades ago.

    Do these climate alarmists actually have any clue about reality and realise what they are saying ???

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s