I don’t remember seeing any discussion of hunting in the Declaration of Independence.
-
Recent Posts
- More Shocking Imagery Of “Abnormally Dry” Fort Collins, Colorado
- Scientific American Shock News : Climate Deniers Were Right All Along
- The War On Sea Level Terrorism
- Quick Note To James Hansen
- 1921 : Earth Had A Fever
- The Consensus Can’t Be Wrong
- 1931 Flood Killed Millions In China
- Shock News : Sea Level Has Risen 120 Metres
- Abnormally Propagandish
- Franny Armstrong Promoting Genocide Against Children Again
- Obama Announces That Terrorism Has Been Defeated
- 400 PPM! We Should Have Listened To The Experts
- Mission Accomplished!
- That New Kind Of Ice, Which Melts at -8C
- Update On The Obama Press Conference
- Another Year Of Flooding On The Poudre
- Sandy Hook Alternate Ending
- The Perfect Father’s Day Gift
- New Summer Bunkerbuster Movie
- Quick Note To President Obama
- Reader Quiz
- Police Snipers Fire Across School Playground And Miss Cow
- 1975 : Climatologists Were Worried That Politicians Wouldn’t Let Them Melt The Arctic In Time To Save The Planet
- Black Helicopters Flying
- 1962 Shock News : Open Water At The North Pole
Recent Comments

And at the time these men risked it all, by signing our declaration, one could bear exactly the same “military style weaponry” that standing armies carried. That was intentional. The only hunting they wanted to protect was the hunt for individual liberty.
NY is going to limit clips to 7 bullets. I had an idea to stop people from imbibing too much. Ban bottles of booze larger than a liter. Unless a person is stopped, how many clips can he go through? It’s all for show to try and shut-up the anti-gun nuts.
It works just as well as limiting the size of soda cups.
Bloomberg seems obsessed with limiting the size of other men’s appendages. He must have been laughed at once by TSA employees operating body scanners.