Lack Of Warming Proves Warming

Since the beginning of the 1970s, the global temperature has risen strongly. However in the last 10-15 years the trend has flattened out considerably. Depending on the year used as a starting point, the trend is practically zero. This is what temperature curves from the different institutes show. Even when there are some slight variations between the curves, they all show the same pattern

The fact that the global temperature rise has stagnated does not contradict long-term climate change. To the contrary: Also in the future we have to anticipate short periods of stagnation or cooling. In principle, the science is not surprised by this finding. This is because such short-term temperature behavior also occurs in climate models (see chart). And that, by the way, in the same models that postulate an anthropogenic temperature increase over the long term.”

Yellow Science…Renowned Climate Modeller Now Claims Temperature Stagnation Is Actually Evidence Of Warming!

You can see this quite clearly in Hansen’s 1988 forecasts which show very rapid, steady warming after the year 2000.

ScreenHunter_321 Dec. 04 13.24

About these ads

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Lack Of Warming Proves Warming

  1. Robert of Ottawa says:

    the science is not surprised by this finding

    If I didn’t know what is meant, I was say this is gibberish. He means the scientific establishment, the people politicizing science, the Lysenkos.

  2. Lou says:

    http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/the-greening-of-the-planet.aspx

    “Dr. Myneni reckons that it is now possible to distinguish between these two effects in the satellite data, and he concludes that 50% is due to “relaxation of climate constraints,” i.e., warming or rainfall, and roughly 50% is due to carbon dioxide fertilization itself. In practice, the two interact. A series of experiments has found that plants tolerate heat better when CO2 levels are higher.
    The inescapable if unfashionable conclusion is that the human use of fossil fuels has been causing the greening of the planet in three separate ways: first, by displacing firewood as a fuel; second, by warming the climate; and third, by raising carbon dioxide levels, which raise plant growth rates.”

    Glad to hear that. I could use fast growth from my trees for instant shade!

  3. Andy DC says:

    Undeniable proof that Obama and his Australian girlfriend have made good on their promises to heal the planet. From that, it is obvious that Obama deserves more than 2 terms. The hell with the stupid Constitution!

  4. Keitho says:

    War is peace

    Truth is lies

    Love is hate

    Cold is Hot

    Wet is dry

    Oh CO2, you amazing little molecule, is there nothing you can’t do?

  5. Dave says:

    “the science is not surprised by this finding” – Is “the science” a person now? Maybe “the science” will be elevated to a deity in the climate religion. The Trinity will be “the science”, “consensus” and Al Gore, the Son of the Science.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s