Recent Comments
Billy Liar on Greenland Reaches A Tipping… Billy Liar on What If Grover Cleveland… omanuel on Nobel Peace Prize Winner Has B… bubbagyro on When Seconds Count, Police Are… John B., M.D. on Nobel Peace Prize Winner Has B… PhilJourdan on Piers Morgan Brags That Brits… Streetcred on Climate Science Is In The… Streetcred on Climate Science Is In The… Streetcred on Piers Morgan Brags That Brits… An Inquirer on 1975 : Tornado Outbreaks Blame…
“So some obscure nobody said it; that’s hardly a consensus”.
I’m practicing channeling Appell. How am I doing?
Well Dave, they say that ignorance is bliss. You might want to ask Dr. Tim Ball who Hubert Lamb was. But you probably don’t know who Dr. Ball is either.
Then again, it might have been an attemp at sarcasm. If that is the case, my appologies.
Many of today’s climate kooks showed brief signs of rational thought in the past. Many others know full well they’re lying thru their teeth today. Nothing that a good Caning couldn’t correct.
There will be another ice age if the mechanic that caused the last ice ages is still working as before. Will we slip into a little ice age or a big ice age is not clear right now, but the solar cycle change is indicating at least a cooling like in the 70′s, if you feel optimistic. I remember the 70′s and somehow, I feel that we are getting there.
I think that the prediction of Habibullo I. Abdussamatov is more a realistic view. Just wait how the 24th solar cycle turns out and if his prediction is fitting the reality.
Will we see it in our life time is first of all a age question. Secondly, I remember a scientist saying that the start of an ice age in the ice core data could not be predicted. The reason is that the temperature didn’t show (real) a trend. It got warmer and colder in cycles and you couldn’t see where it is heading.
also worth noting in the lower right corner of of the article — I thought that kind of violent weather was a recent development due to rising CO2 in the arctic
What is really interesting is the total lack of any reference to the “greenhouse effect in this or any other articles of the day.
The “greenhouse effect” was rejcted and dismissed as “science” shortly after its formal proposal.
It took a fake stunt resulting in a room full of people who had probably never worked a day in their life sweating while listening to the new Messiah preach fire and damnation from the pulpit.
That stunt seems to work every time ??
I am sure that is the only error this university’s faculty has ever made prognostic wise.