RECORD EVENT REPORT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA/GRAND FORKS
745 AM CDT THU MAR 21 2013…RECORD LOW TEMPERATURES SET AT GRAND FORKS INTL AP ND AND TIED AT GRAND FORKS UNIV. (NWS) ND THIS MORNING…
A RECORD LOW TEMPERATURE OF -13 DEGREES WAS SET AT GRAND FORKS INTL AP THIS MORNING…BREAKING THE PREVIOUS RECORD OF -7 DEGREES SET IN 1965.
THE RECORD LOW TEMPERATURE OF -9 DEGREES WAS TIED THIS MORNING AT GRAND FORKS UNIV. (NWS) ND. THE RECORD WAS PREVIOUSLY SET IN 1965.
h/t to Marc Morano
Wow, breaking the previous record low temp by 6 degrees. These things just don’t happen by chance. They only result because the climate dice are loaded! If you don’t believe me, just ask Jimmy Hansen. Obviously, the next ice age is just around the corner! /sarc Hahahahaha.
They are gonna blame it on UHI…
Whatever happened to this prediction?
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/06/16/joe-bastardi-explains-the-warm-us-weather-and-what-to-expect-the-rest-of-the-year/#comment-95261“
last time I checked the upper Midwest was having record cold
Sent from my Virgin Mobile Android-Powered Device
What a cold spot in a small percentage of the country make Bastardi right or wrong?
People want to know….
Wait — Bastardi’s prediction was about Arctic sea ice, not the upper Midwest!
He said, “….The ice is coming back,” Not long after it set a record low.
Can you at least admit that Bastardi’s prediction was completely wrong??
Bastardi already admitted that. Unlike any of your bullshit. 🙂
Small percentage? Down here in Tennessee we are running 20F below normal, and have been all month. We are expected to get snow tonight. Ya, SNOW! In Tennessee! On fricken March 22nd! .. are you kidding me? I left Fargo to get away from this shit…
David Appell:
He said, “….The ice is coming back,” Not long after it set a record low.
What “record low”? You mean a record extending only as far back as the late 1970s, the beginning of satellite measurements? Based on news reports and observations from the 1920s, arctic ice sea extent was probably much lower than it is now. Of course, warmists like yourself aren’t interested in sea ice data beyond the 1970s. It flies in the face of the hare-brained CO2-is-warming-the-earth theory.
Fluctuations in sea ice are the product of natural climate variability. There’s not a shred of observational or empirical evidence to suggest that CO2 has any impact on arctic temperatures (or, for that matter, any temperatures).
By the way, an enormous arctic storm was largely to blame for the early break-up of arctic ice last summer. Human-induced CO2 has about as much impact on the earth’s climate as a fart in a hurricane.
Joe answered you and being the cad you are still cant accept his admission:
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/06/16/joe-bastardi-explains-the-warm-us-weather-and-what-to-expect-the-rest-of-the-year/#comment-95281
“Dave, the main aspect of my forecast is by 2030, NHem temp as measured by objective sat temps and the sea ice returns to where it was when we started the satellite era. As you have picked out me being wrong here, and of course this will be the kajillionth time I have admitted it, I realize that you and your 113 followers or whatever need to hear that I know I am wrong. Since you wish to bring it up again, yes I was wrong about that.
By the way, that forecast also calls FOR A REDUCTION of southern hemisphere sea ice a it should reverse its trend. If it doesnt, than we are in a heap of trouble the other way.
Since I forecast every day, and dont get paid unless I show my clients the value of being right, rather than blog from my basement or wherever it is you are, and since outside of 1 month between jobs I have forecasted every day for the past 10 years, starting working in the field the day after graduation on March 4,1978 and was at the same company for close to 33 years, I would say me being tested in the field far outweighs yours, the weather equal of the fan that eats hot dogs, sits in the stands, and thinks he can play on the field with people who actually know what its like to compete.”
You stopped after that and left.
Drop the bullshit David,you got caught once again.
Right now I’m puzzling over this discussion. Here is the point J. Bastardi made on 2012/06/16 about Arctic ice:
“For the record, and here you are Dave and the rest of the bunch, I think sea ice this year reaches its lowest levels a bit sooner than normal, and comparable to the lows measured in 2007. That being said, the peak this winter I have a little higher than last winter. I am using the Arctic ROOS site”
Wasn’t the low last year commensurate with 2007 levels? Isn’t it running “a little higher” than normal this year as we approach the peak?
So what’s to take issue with (point fingers at, jump up and down about)?
David, By bringing up Bastardi, you are proving our point. Anyone who tries to make long range weather forecasts is ultimately going to make a fool of themselves. In fact lots of NOAA forecasters with their 21st Centrury supercomputer models made fools of themselves quite recently around here by shutting down the Government based on a 6 hour forecast of a non-existent snowstorm.
Glbal Sea Ice, about plus 400,000 sq ‘, not a bad comeback.
Yesterday, March 21st, you made 33 posts on this blog.
It was a Thursday. Don’t you have a job?
If not, who is paying you to blog like this?
If so, does your company know you are blogging like this on their dime?
I wonder how many PH.D holders write like this and consider it a valuable use of their time?
Tommy his job is at the trough.
He tried to post comments at Watts up With That and getting snipped entirely.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/21/mann-hockey-stick-and-the-climate-wars-presentation-on-live-stream/#comment-1254133
and,
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/21/mann-hockey-stick-and-the-climate-wars-presentation-on-live-stream/#comment-1254177
He he.
Watts is afraid of dissenting opinions.
I would be too if I had to defend his position.
ROFLMAO
I think I made my first post at about 3 am this morning.
Why don’t you hire a private investigator to find out why NOAA is tampering with critical climate data?
Have you been a stalker for long, or is it just a recent deviant behavior you have developed?
dT/dCO2 = ?
Is your IP address
68.247.33.235 ?
Is this your IP address
66.666.66.666.phd ?
Is Steve’s IP address 68.247.33.235 ?
I think it is.
I am narrowing in on his identity, slowly but surely.
I have money to spend on a PI, if that’s what it takes.
You are a disturbing person.
Go find yourself a friggin’ life Appell … your wasting oxygen ! AH.
David Appell says:
I am narrowing in on his identity, slowly but surely….I have money to spend on a PI, if that’s what it takes.
Holy Jesus. No wonder he is persona non grata at WUWT.
Maybe now we know the identity of the person who showed up at Anthony’s door….
Repeating again since you sure spend a lot of time here spreading your evasive crap:
“I wonder how many PH.D holders write like this and consider it a valuable use of their time?”
<i“I wonder how many PH.D holders write like this and consider it a valuable use of their time?”
Don’t know. Don’t care.
Next?
Does anyone know of a PH.D in Physics other than David Appell who spends a lot of time obsessing over a blog owners identity and location?
In history of the world or just anywhere on the internet?
Steve, can you please simply answer a question about science?
dT/dCO2 = ?
Over the past 16 years, dT/dCO2 is a small negative number. However , it was a large positive number in 1880 – before the internal combustion engine was invented.
Over the past 16 years, dT/dCO2 is a small negative number.
Why?
Because changes in CO2 above about 100 PPM have very little effect on the radiative balance of the Earth’s atmosphere.
dT/dCO2 = ?
Steve,
I answered his question with a chart a while ago and the dumb ass could not figure it out,but maybe you can get through his rock head with yours?
But I can dream too.
So what is dT/dCO2 = ?
I see that your alma mater shot 9% tonight and got their asses kicked by Harvard ROFL
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/22/sports/ncaabasketball/harvard-beats-no-3-seed-new-mexico.html?_r=0
Appell, PHD? .. ROFLMFAO … yeah, right … and I have a few bridges to sell ya …
Hey David, please describe the GHE hypothesis within the framework of physics.
Which alma mater? I don’t follow sports….
And what type of game?
Please describe the GHE hypothesis within the framework of physics.
You are one creepy person, Mr Appell.
Anyway, do you admit it when you are wrong, just like Joe Bastardi does?
“Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include the making of false accusations or statements of fact (as in defamation), monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information that may be used to harass. The definition of “harassment” must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking in that it occurs through the use of electronic communications technology such as the internet. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2] Both are criminal offenses.[3] Cyberstalking shares important characteristics with offline stalking. Many stalkers – online or off – are motivated by a desire to control their victims.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking
David has proven himself unstable.
So much for the value of his PhD. 😆
This is pathetic and pretty friggin’ creepy. I think you need to get a life. Steven has obviously gotten under your skin to the point of it being an eerily unhealthy obsession. Get some help soon, loser.
Anyone who blogs 33 times/day is either unemployed, or seriously cheating their employer.
Which is your situation?
I’m a prolific blogger, inspired by the biggest scientific fraud in history.
I think you are cheating your employer.
Who employs you?
Where is 68.247.33.235?
You are really a nutcase.
Looks like that is a Sprint Wireless number ROFLMAO
IP Address Lookup – Whois by IP Address : 68.247.33.235
NetName: SPRINT-WIRELESS
IP Address Lookup – Whois by IP Address : 68.247.33.235
NetName: SPRINT-WIRELESS
Dave here is a clue: at the end of Steven’s post it says…
Sent from my Virgin Mobile Android-Powered Device
I looked it up a while ago and knew David is running a wild goose chase.
David Appell, I take it you are unemployed.
He describes himself as “self employed”.
“He describes himself as “self employed”.”
So does that mean he pays himself to make all these stupid comments on Steve’s blog? No wonder he makes so many insanely stupid & repetitive comments. He wants to make himself RICH!!!
Hmmm, I wonder if he’s reporting all this income to the IRS? Do they give a reward to whistle blowers? Hahahaha.
off-topic news tip from an alternate universe …
http://www.techspot.com/news/52023-revived-detroit-electric-to-unveil-tesla-roadster-rival-on-april-3.html
Links to flag Steve
More waste of money and probably got a $300,000 taxpayer “loan” to revive it.
dT/dCO2 = ?
(I’ve seen this kind of evasion before….)
Yawn
It’s a simple question. dT/dCO2 = ?
You must be so bored to keep hanging around here looking for cheap thrills.Try the Playgirl magazines instead.
By now it’s clear your evasion has a purpose.
dT/dCO2 = ?
Have you ever considered the possibility that I am make a fool of you by giving you a run around and you never realize it?
See if you can ever write as well as David Hoffer did here:
“Of course he looks smug. Consider that:
1. He got caught using an algorithm that produces a hockey stick graph regardless of the data.
2. He used the Tiljander data though he was advised that it was upside down, and then tried to claim it was OK because he put it in a footnote.
3. He got caught along with Phil Jones substituting instrumental data for proxy data, wound up admitting that the proxy data doesn’t match the instrumental data for over a third of the instrumental record, but insists that the 1000 years prior to that are probably OK.
4. The only major work prior to Marcott that corroborated his was Briffa’s, and that turned out to be based on just 12 trees from Siberia, with one of them weighted to be 50% of the data, no hockey stick in the other 11 at all, and the 1 with the hockey stick failed to match local temperature records. Plus, Briffa himself has now published a new reconstruction that debunks his original one.
5. All of which left Mann with only a single corroborating study, which is Marcott’s. Turns out that Marcott’s thesis doesn’t match Marcott’s publication, and the publication version only corroborates Mann because it take positive anomalies from the past and moves them forward in time, plus lops negative anomalies off when they become inconvenient.
If I had a career like that and could still collect $10K per day plus expenses for repeating the same bull over and over again, I’d look pretty damn smug too.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/21/mann-hockey-stick-and-the-climate-wars-presentation-on-live-stream/#comment-1254231
He does it without a PH.D,imagine that!
You are working very hard — suspiciously hard — to avoid a simple question:
dT/dCO2 = ?
Still trying to ask a loaded question that has nothing to do with the topic.
Carry on with your bullshit.
Can’t one of your assholes answer a simple question: what is dT/dCO2?
David, please, describe the GHE hypothesis within the framework of physics.
David, you missed my answer
dT/dCO2 is a small negative number over the last 16 years, destroying your beloved theory.
I have a graph of it permanently posted on this blog. Are you completely daft?
http://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/dt_dco2.jpg?w=636&h=384
Here is another one you might like.
http://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/ushurricanestrikesvsco2.jpg?w=640
When people see that you’re afraid to blog using your real name — and I am happy to keep pointing this out — they realize you’re not serious. They see all the people who do use their real name and aren’t afraid, and wonder why you are; And that affects them… and drives many away. All you have lett are people like IBD, and who would ever take their advice?
You’re a nutcase. The only reason you want someone’s real name is so you can stalk and harrass them.
David, please provide even one peer reviewed paper that refutes natural variability as the cause of recent, or any global climate changes. Surely someone who was provided a PhD knows that without disproving NV, it is impossible to blame anything else.
Your unhealthy obsessions with this fantasy, and Steven, are turning you into a raving lunatic. It is not helping your “cause”.
If I had an unstable loser like Mr. Apple lurking around stalking me I would not reveal my identity either. Appel is apparently just another in a long line of potentially violent left wing nutcases. This idiot gives me the creeps.
I can see why he’s self-employed.
After dealing with a couple of severely unstable alarmists, I changed my posting name and disassociated the new name with any of my personal info. It is mainly for the sake of family (Brother at NASA, nephew named after me and also govt employee) that I took these precautions, but I don’t mind the added benefit of keeping the rotten appells away.
One nut told me that if Jesus were still here, He would strangle me. And then there was this cyber stalker of whom I was warned recently. Can’t be too careful when dealing with lunatics.
Pretty Much! Toshinmack the Nutsack!
Are these almost frenzied comments an attempt to deflect attention from the present posting and its implications?
Why doesn’t David just retreat into la-la land like Bil McKibbins seems to be doing? Learn to tweet, David!
(Seriously, you should step back and consider how you’re behaving; this comment thread really is pretty weird.)
I see I have found the weird and creepy end of the Internets again.