No Warming In Antarctica Since The Start Of Satellite Records

ScreenHunter_59 May. 09 18.33

RSS_Monthly_MSU_AMSU_Channel_TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt

Hansen’s “dead certain multi-metre sea level rise” is based on rapid Antarctic warming – which isn’t happening. What is dead-certain is that Hansen’s opinions are worthless.

About these ads

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to No Warming In Antarctica Since The Start Of Satellite Records

  1. tckev says:

    “What is dead-certain is that Hansen’s opinions are worthless.

    IMO you have over estimated him.

  2. bw says:

    Check the surface temp data to confirm the satellite data. The science stations Vostok, Amundsen-Scott, Halley and Davis all show no warming since data began being recorded in 1956 or 1957 during the IGY. Those stations are widely separated. The stations are operated under different nationalities. The instruments recording the data maintained with some sense of scientific quality controls since each was established.

  3. Jimbo says:

    It’s worse than we thought

    “New paper finds upper limit of sea level rise from Antarctic ice sheet is about 70% less than IPCC upper limit ”

    http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2013/05/new-paper-finds-upper-limit-of-sea.html

  4. Doug Proctor says:

    Each time I see a temp profile that doesn’t look like the global GISTemp profile, I wonder where the actual warming is.

    If we were to break down the globe into, say, eight segments, and created temp profiles, I wonder if we would see that “global” warming is only an Arctic and continental USA occurrence.

    I’ve seen the Arctic Ocean breakdown for ice loss, and it is this story: the “global” Arctic ice loss is largely the eastern seas/subbasins. And same if you look to “open” Arctic water supposedly causing all the bad winter snows and cold.

    Factoids are the best way to characterize modern climatological, MSM facts.

  5. woody188 says:

    Erroneous assumption seems to pass for science in the 21st century. How do these “scientists” continue to be employed and get published?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s