Smoking Gun That NCDC Temperature Adjustments Are A Complete Fraud

Raw US HCN data matches RSS satellite US data very closely. This tells us that the raw data is fine, and there is no need to adjust it.

ScreenHunter_324 Dec. 04 19.16

rss_monthly_msu_amsu_channel_tlt_anomalies_land_and_ocean_v03_3.txt

Index of /pub/data/ghcn/daily/hcn/

But the problem for NOAA is that the raw data doesn’t show any warming, which means no funding, so they cheat by cooling the past and warming the present. The next graph compares their tampered data with the RSS satellite data. The tampered data diverges from satellite data by 1.4ºC per century.

ScreenHunter_325 Dec. 04 19.16

Climate at a Glance | Time Series

There is no basis for the tampering, and it is obvious that NOAA isn’t doing any verification vs. satellites. Junk science at it’s absolute worst.

About these ads

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Smoking Gun That NCDC Temperature Adjustments Are A Complete Fraud

  1. Chewer says:

    What’s worse than a pack of thieves?
    Lying and cheating thieves exhibiting neurotic behavior, who also demand the full indoctrination of your children!

  2. B.C. says:

    Can’t wait for the WHYouth New Brown Shirts to join ranks with NOAA and its sundry bastard offspring agencies for Klimanacht. All of us “deniers” will have to wear yellow suns on our clothing so we can be readily identified by the Kohlenstofftruppen*. None must question Der Zero.

    *Carbontroopers

    • Chewer says:

      Carbontroopers, that is rich!
      Thanks BC ;-)

    • KGB = Klimat Globische Bullscheiss

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      Whitehausjugend.

    • D. J. Hawkins says:

      American citizens own about 300 million firearms of diverse types. I suspect we won’t go quietly into that good night.

      • BC says:

        Oh HELL no! It certainly isn’t going to be “quiet”. :-)

        Even General Yamamoto was scared shi’iteless of the U.S.’s gun-totin’ rednecks when there were a helluva lot less of us. The Leftaridian puscht to grab guns is going to get very loud in the near future, precisely because the Neo-Marxists know that they don’t stand a snowball’s chance in Haiti of defeating a well-armed, well-trained populace of patriots.

  3. Eric Simpson says:

    I think the scare mongering Chicken Littles are like those “youths” playing the knockout game. The warmist loons just hope for one knockout “punch” to knockout industrial civilization. In the US they almost got that with the insane 83% CO2 cuts mandated in the cap & trade bill that passed the House in 2009. Almost. But fortunately it didn’t quite make it to Obama’s terdy hands.
    “A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer.” -Paul Ehrlich
    “Isn’t the only hope for this planet the total collapse of industrial civilisation? Is it not our responsibility to ensure that this collapse happens?’” -Maurice Strong, ex UNEP Director
    “A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States… [we] must design a stable, low-consumption economy.” -John Holdren (1973), Obama’s Science Czar
    “We can’t drive our SUVs, and, uh, you know, eat as much as we want… and then just expect that every other country [is going to be ok with that].” -Barack H Obama

  4. Fun comments, but I would just add that the first graph above shows us the “US mean temperature” (in October, at least) is not known to better than 0.5 °C uncertainty.

  5. Drumwaster says:

    I note that they seriously skewed the Y-axis, so as to distort the slope upwards, so to speak.

  6. Latitude says:

    …but but

    How am I supposed to support third world dictators!!

  7. Phil Jones says:

    Last time NOAA manipulated real data measurements at the rate of 2.5 degrees C per Century… Now they’re down to 1.4 …. Perhaps we’re making progress??

  8. Ed Minchau says:

    What are the correlation coefficients for those f(x)? Wouldn’t Fourier analysis be better than linear regression?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s