Understanding The IPCC Process

Two IPCC lead authors say that governments are interfering with the science. So basically, governments are writing the reports and not allowing the scientists to speak.

Then the government written, science-free report is published, and governments declare “the scientists have spoken, we have to take action

About these ads

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Understanding The IPCC Process

  1. omanuel says:

    That deception has been going on for sixty-nine years, since the Second World War ended and pompous world leaders decided to save the world from nuclear annihilation by hiding the source of energy that destroyed Hiroshima, Neutron Repulsion !

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_2.pdf

  2. omnologos says:

    In case you missed it…read the story of David Nutt.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Nutt#Dismissal

    If you’re working with the Government you’re either following the Party Line, or fired. No matter how good your expertise.

    • omanuel says:

      That is the current sad state of affairs. But the good news is just this and nothing less: United world leaders and all their weapons and armies of consensus scientists are totally powerless over “Reality!

  3. omanuel says:

    Roger Sowell, an attorney and Chemical engineer, presents good reasons to doubt IPCC’s story:

    http://judithcurry.com/2014/04/27/the-curry-factor-30-to-1/#comment-534433

  4. Andy Oz says:

    The officially approved Ouija board for Antarctic climate forecasting has been published.
    http://www.bom.gov.au/ant/handbook/handbook.shtml
    No-one can predict weather in Antarctica without referring to it first.

  5. Andy Oz says:

    CSIRO has the same workplace rules as the IPCC. Any dissent from the approved party line, i.e. religiously scripted fervour for CAGW dogma, will be ruthlessly purged.
    http://m.smh.com.au/national/public-service/csiros-bullybusting-unit-set-up-following-accusations-of-toxic-workplaces-20140428-37d0f.html

  6. Andy Oz says:

    Meanwhile ENSO has swung back to nuetral. The East Pacific is cooling off.
    Let us all pray to Gaia, for a terrible El Niño that kills millions so that Hansen, Trenberth and Mann et al, will not be embarrassed once again by a relatively normal NH summer. Naaah!
    http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/enso/#tabs=SOI

  7. Justa Joe says:

    The UN IPCC is a joke. The whole concept reminds me of some grade B sci-fi flick from the 60’s.

  8. philjourdan says:

    I think that is called a Circle jerk.

  9. Tom In Indy says:

    Then the government written, science-free report is published

    The propaganda machine – 10 steps to the achieve the liberal/radical agenda:
    1. Liberal/Radical activist publishes a biased paper supporting the liberal enviro/health/economic/etc agenda.
    2. It’s not hard to find a Liberals activist on the editorial board of popular academic journals.
    3. The editor sends the paper to fellow activist peer reviewers who recommend publication.
    4. The bogus paper is published and trumpeted by the liberal press.
    5. The government cites the “science”.
    6. The government and the liberal press ridicule anyone who questions the result in order to marginalize dissenters and remove opposing viewpoints from public discourse.
    7. The narrative is established and reinforced with multiple government and private media outlets repeating the false narrative and bogus results. (Repetition increases the weight the public consciousness attaches to the propaganda.)
    8. Public perception on the issue moves closer to the liberal/radical line.
    9. The probability of electing a liberal/radical to public office goes up.
    10. Liberal/radical policies become law and society is successfully engineered to fit the liberal/radical agenda.

  10. Svend Ferdinandsen says:

    Editors need not be scientists, and with all the papers to sort out, you can just pick the papers that support the policy. The joke is they call it science.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s