The measured USHCN daily temperature data shows a decline in US temperatures since the 1930s. But before they release it to the public, they put it thorough a series of adjustments which change it from a cooling trend to a warming trend.
The graph below shows the difference between the published data and the measured data.
The next blink comparator shows changes in the US temperature record from GISS. It alternates between their 1999 graph and the 2012 version of the same graph. The past is cooled and the present is warmed.
The next graph shows the difference between the 2012 version of the GISS US temperature graph, and 1999 version.
How the US hockey stick was built
As of 1999, there wasn’t any warming in the US
Hansen made these remarkable comments in 1999 :
Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought. The drought of 1999 covered a smaller area than the 1988 drought, when the Mississippi almost dried up. And 1988 was a temporary inconvenience as compared with repeated droughts during the 1930s “Dust Bowl” that caused an exodus from the prairies, as chronicled in Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath…..
in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country
At that time, GISS US temperature data showed an 80+ year decline in US temperatures, with 1934, 1921 and 1931 being the three hottest years
This data has been deleted from the GISS web site, but originally resided at this URL
It has been archived here :
www.john-daly.com/usatemps.006
The next graph shows the 1920-1999 changes which Hansen made to the US temperature record since 1999 – in GISS version 3.
The GISS US temperature graph looks like this
The next blink comparator shows the changes that were made to the US temperature data since 1999. The year 1998 was promoted from #4 to #1.
Hockey sticks are indeed man-made – by climate activists pretending to be scientific heads of government agencies.
Good work. That is just the tip of the tip of the iceberg.
i can see this expanding exponentially!!
Yada, yada, yada. All you denialists can do is accuse scientists of dishonesty, fraud, socialism, etc. I guess it’s hard when you don’t have any facts on your side.
I presented the facts in this post, and you ignored them and instead wrote gossip. Are you completely daft?
The links you supplied to the data don’t work. I suspect there is fabrication is going on, but its not where you are pointing.
All of the links work fine. Do you know how to click on a link?
Mr. Schroedinger, Are you claiming that Mr. Goddard simply made up some cartoons? If you go to GISS and USHCN you can see the data for youreslf. It takes some effort and little more than a high school education. But that is better than exposing yourself as a hysterical screaming nincompoop.
On behalf of high-school dropouts everywhere, I take offense to lumping that moronic troll in with us.
Fraud is illegal, pointing out the fraud is not. Just because you are quick to turn a blind eye to evidence of fraud when it suits your position doesn’t mean that others will be so spineless.
Wow, erschroendinger, kind of an ironic statement you are making there. Have yet to see you present any facts to us, because I, like many of us here, would sure like to know what “facts’ you have to present.
It’s like a one hit and run wonder!
Wow, that guy was a troll, lol.
So your argument, if I can sum it up for you, is who are you going to believe, your lying eyes or James Hansen?
@erschroedinger YOU are the problem. YOU and the likes of you are liars, cheats, whiners and crybabies. When people present FACTS, such as “here is EVIDENCE that someone LIED”, all you can do is response in typical alarmist fashion? Calling people deniers and blaming them for exposing the frauds for whom they are? YOU are the idiot. Go back into your basement.
Dishonesty fraud and Socialism are just the beginning, let’s throw in Liberalism which is commonly known as a mental disorder mixed in with with a little Marxism for tyranny and an inability to work or function in the arena of ideas with out throwing a fit and hiding your heads in the sand when confronted with empirical data and evidence refuting your junk science all day long and yes you find it right here on this website. Your a real Dinger erschroedinger!
“I guess it’s hard when you don’t have any facts on your side.”
I’m surprised he can spell ‘facts’…
Nice work Steven, this has now been added to my ‘Data Fraud’ file.
I think we need a more than just a ‘file” with all of the fraud that has occurred with the AGW idiots.
Hey Eric! I have over 40 separate files on ‘climate change’, and can easily reference them on my iPhone anywhere, anytime. I can always back my assertions with data.
I have files like ‘Hansen’, ‘Big Green’, ‘Hockey Stick’, and so on. It obliterates warmists, who NEVER have hard data!
Doesn’t it bother anyone that the US Goverment is directing, encouraging, condoning, tolerating , …(you pick) large-scale lieing???
G.
The US Government is led by a better class of people than the rest of us. They know better than we do. Their hearts are pure and their opposition is entirely evil and wrong. They should be allowed to lie because they have only the best of intentions. There is no room for contradictory facts. If they need to correct raw data to make it reflect revealed truth, they are doing the Lord’s work.
Amen!
Facts don’t bother the Church of Warmingology. Really though, what is their rationale for the “adjustment”?
I followed this data over the years and i also pointed out the changes and tampering to various people on various websites, only to get abused and hassled and told that i was making this all up to suit an agenda!!!
So well done on all this info!
Good job Steve. Look at the sun’s variability and that doesn’t cause this.
Look at the ocean heat change and there is nothing there.
Look at sea level change and it isn’t responding as if things are getting warmer.
All you have left, as you have pointed out here, is that the temperature record is just bogus.
Can I put this in tomorrow’s news?
Hmmm, The sensational way this article is written sounds like someone has a not-so-hidden agenda. According to the one NASA link provided, the 1999 article of which the text has been taken out of context is series of questions trying to understand why the USA data is not heating up as much as the rest of the world with an assumption that when better tools become available the mystery will be understood and not a damning expose on scientific underhandedness.
While I don’t understand the particulars, Nasa records of data changes sound reasonable. Removal of data points that did not meet quality control checks (i.e. may not be accurate) and an admission that data was changed because values were “inadvertently appended to USHCN data for prior years without including the adjustments at these stations that had been defined by the NOAA National Climate Data Center)”
I’ll put you down for supporting data tampering by government employees.