This is my last post on this web site. All future posts will be done here: http://realclimatescience.com/
Please bookmark that site, and start using it instead of this one. Legacy posts will still be available here.
Thanks, Tony
NASA didn’t like the 1940’s warmth in Greenland, so they simply made it disappear.
Last summer, University of California scientists made this hysterical claim about the Zachariae Isstrom glacier in northeast Greenland.
Massive northeast Greenland glacier is rapidly melting, UCI-led team finds
It’s a great story, only problem is it is a complete fabrication. If anything, the glacier has grown since 2012.
2012: EOSDIS Worldview 2015 : EOSDIS Worldview
In 1940, scientists reported that glaciers in Northeast Greenland were receding very rapidly, and were “nearing a catastrophe.“
06 May 1940 – Greenland’s Climate Becoming Milder – Trove
The glaciers are still there, there is no catastrophe, and the only thing that has changed is that the fraudsters at NASA have erased the 1940’s warmth in that region.
If the glaciers were receding rapidly in 1940 and are not now, then it must have been warmer in 1940 than it is now. But logic and data are not a part of the criminal venture known as “climate science.”
From 1984 through 2011, the NSIDC new (left below) and old (right below) ice age versions were nearly identical.
Note the small discrepancy between the two versions in the graph below. The amount of five year old ice was almost identical between the two versions.
In 2012, the versions started to diverge. Four and five year old ice began to disappear from the new version,
By 2013, the new version had lost more than half of the five year old ice.
Their methodology is to track ice flows week to week. The two versions tracked each other very closely for over 1,400 weeks, and then suddenly began to rapidly diverge. What scientific basis could this have? You don’t just lose 500 km² floes of thick multi-year ice.
The fact that they have a 100% discrepancy between the new and old versions in the amount of five year old ice, tells me that their data and graphs are completely worthless for doing year over year comparisons since 2011.
The 1995 IPCC report showed no net troposphere warming for almost 40 years, measured by balloons and satellites. The data sets have since been “adjusted” to better match theory.
In order to understand the magnitude of the NSIDC disappearing ice scandal, you have to understand how the ice age is evaluated.
The ice age is determined by tracking individual ice flows from week to week. In the case of the disappearing five year old ice, they had been tracking it every week for five years – and then suddenly claimed that it never existed. It defies credibility.
The animation below shows the ice going backwards in time to 2012. It takes a lot of “special science” to disappear ice they have been tracking for more than 250 weeks.
Just one more massive climate fraud from the team.
Today is a big day for the skeptic community. This is the day we get our message out!
Buy your tickets early and come early to the show. There will be a pre-show quiz on screen.
There is only one show on one day, and it will likely sell out in many theaters.
I will be live on the Charles Butler talk radio show Monday morning at 9 am Eastern. Expected topics will be NSIDC data tampering, Climate Hustle and Dr. Bill Gray.
Real Science 