Toto Has Moved!

This is my last post on this web site.  All future posts will be done here: http://realclimatescience.com/

Please bookmark that site, and start using it instead of this one. Legacy posts will still be available here.

Thanks,  Tony

Cooling Nuuk

NASA didn’t like the 1940’s warmth in Greenland, so they simply made it disappear.

2016 Version   2011 Version

Escape The Heat At Your Local Movie Theater

Charles Butler Interview – May 2, 2016

Massive Greenland Fraud Is Rapidly Growing

Last summer, University of California scientists made this hysterical claim about the Zachariae Isstrom glacier in northeast Greenland.

Massive northeast Greenland glacier is rapidly melting, UCI-led team finds

It’s a great story, only problem is it is a complete fabrication. If anything, the glacier has grown since 2012.

2012: EOSDIS Worldview 2015 : EOSDIS Worldview

In 1940, scientists reported that glaciers in Northeast Greenland were receding very rapidly, and were “nearing a catastrophe.“

06 May 1940 – Greenland’s Climate Becoming Milder – Trove

The glaciers are still there, there is no catastrophe, and the only thing that has changed is that the fraudsters at NASA have erased the 1940’s warmth in that region.

If the glaciers were receding rapidly in 1940 and are not now, then it must have been warmer in 1940 than it is now. But logic and data are not a part of the criminal venture known as “climate science.”

More Detail On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice

From 1984 through 2011, the NSIDC new (left below) and old (right below) ice age versions were nearly identical.

Note the small discrepancy between the two versions in the graph below. The amount of five year old ice was almost identical between the two versions.

In 2012, the versions started to diverge. Four and five year old ice began to disappear from the new version,

By 2013, the new version had lost more than half of the five year old ice.

Their methodology is to track ice flows week to week.  The two versions tracked each other very closely for over 1,400 weeks, and then suddenly began to rapidly diverge. What scientific basis could this have? You don’t just lose 500 km² floes of thick multi-year ice.

The fact that they have a 100% discrepancy between the new and old versions in the amount of five year old ice, tells me that their data and graphs are completely worthless for doing year over year comparisons since 2011.

1995 IPCC Report Showed No Troposphere Warming From 1958 To 1995

The 1995 IPCC report showed no net troposphere warming for almost 40 years, measured by balloons and satellites. The data sets have since been “adjusted” to better match theory.

 

ipcc_sar_wg_I_full_report.pdf