Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
John on The Price Of Telling The Truth… Don Gaddes on Seven Year Drought Killed 40%… Bill Sokeland on NSIDC : Arctic Was Ice Free In… Notes To Ponder on 45 Years Since Paul Ehrlich Wa… gator69 on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… gator69 on Toto Has Moved! Menicholas on Toto Has Moved! Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Ed Darrell on Phil Jones Removing The 1940…
The Democrats listed in this article all face eviction notices in November.
Seems the article is a bit of a bait and switch. On the one had you have a vote on “climate change legislation” on the other hand you have support for an “energy bill”. Energy Bill not equal Climate change legislation. Expanding Offshore drilling and removing impedients to building Nuclear Power plants and making more/better use of coal would all be things that could fall under the heading of “Energy bill” that would be as far from the “climate change” bill that those endangered congresscritters voted for as one could possibly get.
Steven, I think you will get a kick out of this.
You know how Americans have heard about those “Shovel Ready Jobs” to jumpstart the economy? Guess what, I found one:
http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=0902133
It appears that there are some good size coffers in the P2C2 $9.75-11mil/year for 35 awards.
http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10542/nsf10542.htm
We must have liked the Paleo so much, we couldn’t contain ourselves.
An energy bill is not the same as supporting AGW. A comprehensive energy policy has been the dream of many americans since the Arab oil embargo of the 70s. They want an energy bill that maps out a plan to make the US energy independent – and that is independent of AGW.
Remember this poll was done by the National Resources Defense Council Action Fund. What are they going to say? That there policies will result in their candidates getting wiped out in the next election?