No Change At The Sólheimajökul Glacier In Iceland Since 2007


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to No Change At The Sólheimajökul Glacier In Iceland Since 2007

  1. Mike Davis says:

    We actually Paid someone to do this!

  2. Whytee says:

    So what? Nice time lapse photo of glacier that has lost 50% of its volume in the past 10 years. To understand what is going on, we need to look at glaciers change globally. And for that, the World Glacier Monitoring Service is the proper source. Look at this paper ( The graphs on pages 25 and 30 are revealing.

    • The Earth has lost 99% of it’s glaciers over the last 15,000 years. Extremely disturbing. Think what a great city New York would be if it still had a mile of ice!

      Greenland has become a great center of culture, art and learning because of their ice age climate.

    • Mike Davis says:

      SO WHAT?
      The glaciers are losing the ice they gained during the “Little Ice Age” and most started shrinking some 200+ years ago! Some are now advancing and the total number of glaciers being monitored world wide is a non statistically significant number to determine any current trend.
      This is like a polling organization that polls 400 people to determine what 4 million are thinking.

      • serioussam says:

        Your post contains a glaring contradiction.

        On one hand you claim glaciers have been in decline since the little ice age. You claim “Some are now advancing” implying that this post little ice age decline has been ongoing in recent decades.

        But then you claim we just can’t know the global trend of glaciers because we don’t have a big enough sample. Well if we can’t know the trend, how can you make your first claims?

  3. peterhodges says:

    Whytee says:
    November 5, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    Nice time lapse photo of glacier that has lost 50% of its volume in the past 10 years.

    What an utterly ridiculous statement. The pictures are graphic and real refutation.

    All of climate “science” is like this, some fat asses on the public dime sitting behind their computers in colorado or switzerland or wherever, fudging the data.

    just a year ago or so several glaciers in the himalaya were listed as receding or dissapearing by these same charlatans in their offices somewhere. (not the 2035 gaff) Which of course careened through the global press.

    The principle indian investigator, who actually goes out to the glaciers, measures them, and photographs them, of course refuted the whole thing.

  4. Scarlet Pumpernickel says:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s