Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
John on The Price Of Telling The Truth… Don Gaddes on Seven Year Drought Killed 40%… Bill Sokeland on NSIDC : Arctic Was Ice Free In… Notes To Ponder on 45 Years Since Paul Ehrlich Wa… gator69 on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… gator69 on Toto Has Moved! Menicholas on Toto Has Moved! Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Ed Darrell on Phil Jones Removing The 1940…
Maybe the 31,000 of the Oregon Petition can push right back.
The still-evolving efforts reveal a shift among climate scientists, many of whom have traditionally stayed out of politics and avoided the news media.
ROTFL! i spit some coffee out with that one…
many of whom have traditionally stayed out of politics and avoided the news media
James Hansen and Mark Surreze can’t be among them.
it should read,
“who have saturated the media.”
Is this a “my dad knows more scientists than your dad does” sorta thing?
Morano said the Valiant 700 has miraculously morphed into 39.
Bwuhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
At least they aren’t trying to hide this decline.
The American Geophysical Union plans to announce Monday that 700 researchers have agreed to speak out on the issue.
In the week that Abraham and others have been marshaling the rapid-response team, 39 scientists agreed to participate….
This seems to remind me of the Million Man March.
They should go to Aspen as a way of showing the effects of Global Warming. Maybe they can provide pictures of the dead fish along the Amazon due to incense cold or the dead penguins in South Africa.
AGU needs to push back at the phantom problem because if it becomes real they will lose their funding as a result of their practices. The AGW promoters have good reason to fear being caught. It will probably be more a lack of a paper trail than a paper trail because standard scientific practice requires a paper trail.
Did they tell them that the Chicago Climate Exchange just closed it’s doors?
http://www.suite101.com/content/carbon-trade-ends-on-quiet-death-of-chicago-climate-exchange-a305704#ixzz14cMLxCNs
“What is the effect on the climate of a CO2 molecule?”
“What do you mean by that? A natural CO2 molecule, or an anthropogenic CO2 molecule?”
“What? I don’t know….AAAAAAHHHHHH!”
When you are king, you have to know these things.
Hundreds? Last year in Copenhagen we were told they were thousands!!
Pingback: Dear @Revkin: THIS Is The Science Worth Defending « The Unbearable Nakedness of CLIMATE CHANGE