Schmidt/Mann Understood The Sun Ten Years Ago

http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2001/2001_Shindell_etal_1.pdf

When did they lose their skill at understanding the climate?

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Schmidt/Mann Understood The Sun Ten Years Ago

  1. Anything is possible says:

    Hey! How about that!

    Remove CO2 sensitivity from GCM’s and their output starts to resemble reality!

  2. Brian G Valentine says:

    I have not seen a reference of theirs since 2005 wherein the terminology “climate forcing” wasn’t synonymous with “greenhouse gas focing.”

  3. Mike Davis says:

    I do not put much faith in any paper from that group. You do understand what they used to fit the models to? The Hockey Stick!

    It is just another version of their fantasy to support their ACC agenda!

    See we got this for that period but the same conditions are not evident now so something else must be the driver! Magic CO2 must be the answer!
    Their BS has been going on since the mid 70s and this is just another in the line of needed misinformation research papers!

  4. Baa Humbug says:

    Obviously the brains of the outfit was Shindell. Schmidt did the typing, Mann and Rind looked after the punctuation and graph drawing and the chick posted the paper off to get published.

  5. Dave N says:

    Wow.. colder temps in NH Winter during low solar activity. Sounds very familiar.

    • Dave N says:

      Sorry.. just remembered.. add La Nina to the equation..

      As “Anything” said, who needs CO2?

      • Mike Davis says:

        MET, GISS, NOAA, UEA, BOW, NIWA, IPCC, and a whole S load of ECO nut jobs.
        Dave :
        The list is just to long to properly answer that question. It is past time to shorten the list!

  6. PhilJourdan says:

    When did they lose their skill at understanding the climate?

    Money

  7. Kramer says:

    “When did they lose their skill at understanding the climate?”

    When they realized it wouldn’t serve to further the NEIO.

  8. Pingback: Di clima ce n'è uno solo! | Climate Monitor

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s