The End Of Line For The Scam

Global Warming? ROFL


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to The End Of Line For The Scam

  1. Tony Duncan says:

    There you have it.
    Hansen’s public prediction from 1988 that the temperature in the US on the 3rd week of January, 2011 would have people frying eggs on the sidewalk in Fargo!

    • I have rarely conversed with anyone so consistently unable to grasp what is going on around him.

    • Jimbo says:

      You’re getting warm!

      1989 interview with Dr James Hansen
      Within 20 or 30 years.

      “The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change.” Then he said, “There will be more police cars.” Why? “Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up.”

      The term “West Side Highway” is often mistakenly used, particularly by the news media traffic reporters, to include the roadway north of 72nd street which is properly known as the Henry Hudson Parkway.

    • Justa Joe says:

      Hansen would never have been that far off on a prediction. Hansen’s predictions are always dead nuts on.

  2. Tony Duncan says:

    I am honored.
    And I am not even a climate scientist, and I am STILL unable to grasp what is happening.
    But I guess you must never converse with any of them.

  3. Tony Duncan says:


    that means you must have convinced EVERYONE you have conversed with that ACC is a fraud and a scam, but not a conspiracy. Very impressive

  4. smiffy says:

    Tony Duncan is your typical lefty tax payer funded troll. Several were exposed here in Australia when it was discovered the labor party were paying people out of the public purse to troll websites spewing the party line. Just like Tony, so easy to spot, overly smug in their own ignorance.

    • glacierman says:

      The question is, does Tony like trolling website, or seminar calling talk shows better?

    • Tony Duncan says:

      Actually Smiffy. It is the Labor of Love Party. And I should be paying THEM for the fun I have here.

      And I am glad you realize I am smug in my ignorance. if it wasn’t for my ignorance I wouldn’t learn anything new. Something that happens here periodically

  5. Mike Davis says:

    We know what the weather will be in the next few weeks: Anything BUT what would be indicated by ACC theory and Models Based on the PHYSICS of human induced GHGs.
    Seeing how TonyD provided the opening response it might be a good time and opportunity to do a bit of research and discuss our visitor with what appears to be the Pinocchio Syndrome / Mental Myopia /Crainialanalinsertitis / Chicken Little Syndrome or any number of other afflictions that might be cause for Tony”s performance on this site. I realize it could be as simple as a bad joke writer or as obvious as lack of presentation skills.
    Maybe based on observations we can apply an Algorerythm by extrapolating assumptions and model Tony’s physics. At the end of our research using the latest pathological science methods and doing virtual experiments in our Sim-tony models we can do a virtual Peer review paper and arrive at a consensus.
    Like anything else in the real world there will be Tony Sceptics and even Tony Deniers. Some will think that Tony was created and filmed on a vacant lot in South America. Some Might think Tony is a Computer Generated Animation. Based on observations some might come to the conclusion that Tony is a compilation of a small group of personalities that want to appear as a single unit. For all we know Tony might be the head of the publicity department for Greenpeace, NAS, UCS, EPA, any number of other ECO Wacko groups or even Al Gore’s Mother.
    If we approach this properly we might be able to create a need for a full blown study of the Tony Syndrome and apply for a government grant for additional study!

    Is Tony for real? Is Tony just a composite virtual figure created by Big Oil to discredit the ACC promoters?
    Was Tony Created by Steven to add spice to the conversations? Is Tony one of Steven’s children doing Pay Back?
    Is Tony one of Steven’s Co-workers playing a practical joke?

  6. Andy Weiss says:

    Are these temps maxes, mins or averages? Whatever, it’s plenty cold. But along with Asia and Russia, the US is a tiny little place on the map and local conditions don’t mean anything!!!

  7. PhilJourdan says:

    Tony Duncan says:
    January 5, 2011 at 7:11 am
    There you have it.
    Hansen’s public prediction from 1988 that the temperature in the US on the 3rd week of January, 2011 would have people frying eggs on the sidewalk in Fargo!

    3rd Week? Is there some type of time warp? That is the second week from all the charts I have seen.

  8. NoMoreGore says:

    Bastardi’s graph was even worse. He was showing the cold stretching virtually from coast to coast…. at least that’s how it looked on the video.

  9. AusieDan says:

    Phil Jordon
    Do you mean that the flood will still come as predicted?
    I’m out of there (if I was there at the time).

  10. AusieDan says:

    A vitual flood of fried eggs is what I meant.
    Oh well, it’s nearly Christmas again.

  11. Nancy Moss says:

    People, you are talking about weather, not climate. A cold winter has nothing to do with climate change. Climate looks at global average temperature over time. Climate change is very real. All scientific institutions around the world support that climate change is caused by humans. Please stop confusing weather and climate, and look at the science — not the media’s interpretation of the science. Also, there is more to think about than climate. Have any of you thought about the health impacts of the increasing CO2 if you are determined to dismiss climate change?

    • Hot weather is climate.

      Cold weather is impossible because the oceans and the Arctic have overheated. Humans can thrive in CO2 levels 50X higher than present values.

    • Mike Davis says:

      I have given a lot of thought to health concerns related to increased CO2 in the atmosphere. The conclusion is that increased CO2 increases production in vegetation and the plants clean the air and ground water allowing me to live a healthier life than if the plants were stunted bu low CO2 concentrations.
      Most of your pet observers are talking about weather events related to changing climate. Of course climate changes and always has changed but one can not see climate patterns by observing weather and 60 years is a regional weather cycle so does not represent climate.
      There is NO Global Average Temperature except for the ones created to justify spending money to do research on phantoms that exist only in the minds of the researchers and their followers.l
      It appears the ones dismissing real climate change are the believers of the pronouncements of the Chicken Little Brigade!

    • PhilJourdan says:

      All scientific institutions around the world support that climate change is caused by humans

      75 scientists are not “all” the scientific institutions around the world. I challenge you to list “all” the scientific institutions – and then their position on it.

      Throwing idiotic statements out with no basis in fact or reality is not conducive to a healthy debate. Real scientists know that “science” is not settled facts are extremely rare.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s