$2.5 Billlion Per Year Studying Global Warming – Zero Return

Can anyone think of one useful thing that has come out of global warming research?

Climate scientists seem to be nearly 100% wrong, 100% percent of the time. It is a mindless religion based on superstition, not a science.

Manhattan is not underwater and snow is not a thing of the past.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to $2.5 Billlion Per Year Studying Global Warming – Zero Return

  1. MikeTheDenier says:

    The UN’s IPCC Assessor David Shearman wants you to pay an eco tax of $18,000 for every child you have. This is to compensate the planet for you being a human. Don’t forget the eco elitists in power think you are a disease, a scourge on the planet, a virus that needs to be eliminated so the logical consequence is they want you to pay even more for being a human – that is to them of course. They have taken it upon themselves to represent the earth – no one voted them there – they elevated themselves to that position and now they feel they have the right to tell the rest of us how to live. They are taking their Malthusian steps like the Fabians – one step at a time. Putting us in a pot of cold water like lobsters and slowly heating it till it is boiling.

    http://icecap.us/index.php/go/political-climate

  2. Andy Weiss says:

    Well, at least the latest research has informed us that AGW can make the weather hot, cold, wet and dry. Before we spent the research money, we didn’t have a clue what caused all those things!

  3. Chris F says:

    Zero return for us, but very beneficial to the NWO crowd.

  4. Latitude says:

    1. More people have realized that more science is a scam.

    I love TV commercials:
    You just have to use this new drug – Makurheadimplode
    Immediately followed by the next commerical from a law firm.
    “If you took Makurheadimplode and your head imploded call us.

  5. Jimbo says:

    “$2.5 Billlion Per Year Studying Global Warming – Zero Return”

    “$2.5 Billlion Per Year Studying The Weather – Zero Return”

  6. suyts says:

    2.5 billion? I think your low balling that a bit. But I’m not sure well ever get to how much this insanity really costs.

  7. Justa Joe says:

    The CAGW hoax is the greatest mis-allocation of resources and funds that the world has ever known. However, for guys like Algore, Mann, Hansen, and the guy that founded the now defunct CCX the CAGW hoax bin veddy veddy goot to dem.

  8. Anything is possible says:

    Zero return may be a bit unfair.

    They are tying themselves in so many knots trying to demonstrate AGW that they actually doing a darned fine job of disproving it…..

  9. omnologos says:

    What about the large numbers kept in lawful employment in the tourism, travel and corporate conferencing industries?

  10. Sundance says:

    It doesn’t seem right to be spending all that money when we know from Al Gores’ testimony in 2007 that the science is settled. Wouldn’t this be like still spending $2.5 billion per year studying gravity?

  11. Bob says:

    “Manhattan is not underwater…”

    Actually, Manhattan was under water. Snow is water, right?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s