I don’t like the Sarah Palin crosshairs thing either. But I think she did it innocently, maybe taking a jab at the anti-hunting crowd, and nothing more. To go on to blame her for what happened on Saturday is way out of line—it is rabid political dogs who would do that. Why aren’t these dogs pointing out how the man had Marx and Hitler on his favorites list?
Using terms and visuals related to targeting opponents has been common practice for years. For anyone in the Media of political arena to bring it up as a negative now shows a level of ignorance on the part of the person making the claim and the editor that allowed it to be published. The politicians have script writers they use for any speech and it appears they need to find new speech writers because their current ones are ruining their careers.
Excerpt: For those unfamiliar with “jumping the shark”, I’d strongly suggest looking up this Hollywood idiom. It appears we are witnessing this in epic fashion as the far-left shamelessly exploits violence for the second time in four months: first, the fake explosive executions of climate change doubters in last October’s 1010global.org video; now they agonize over the very real Giffords shooting. Both showcase the far-left’s attempts to marginalize and silence their critics, while spewing the same kind of vitriol they ironically claim should end.
I agree they jumped the shark. Like most things, they over used a tactic that worked a decade ago. But fortunately, most people cannot be fooled all the time. As they double down on this, I suspect it will backfire on them as everyone who is anyone of knowledge on this has already told them they are full of dookie.
Real Science 
I don’t like the Sarah Palin crosshairs thing either. But I think she did it innocently, maybe taking a jab at the anti-hunting crowd, and nothing more. To go on to blame her for what happened on Saturday is way out of line—it is rabid political dogs who would do that. Why aren’t these dogs pointing out how the man had Marx and Hitler on his favorites list?
Because Tea Party folk don’t read that stuff. The media obviously wants this person to not be a pothead lefty.
Using terms and visuals related to targeting opponents has been common practice for years. For anyone in the Media of political arena to bring it up as a negative now shows a level of ignorance on the part of the person making the claim and the editor that allowed it to be published. The politicians have script writers they use for any speech and it appears they need to find new speech writers because their current ones are ruining their careers.
First, exploding climate skeptics, now with Giffords shooting – “The Far-left ‘Jumps the Shark’ over Tucson Tragedy” http://biggovernment.com/rcook/2011/01/12/the-far-left-jumps-the-shark-over-tucson-tragedy/
Excerpt: For those unfamiliar with “jumping the shark”, I’d strongly suggest looking up this Hollywood idiom. It appears we are witnessing this in epic fashion as the far-left shamelessly exploits violence for the second time in four months: first, the fake explosive executions of climate change doubters in last October’s 1010global.org video; now they agonize over the very real Giffords shooting. Both showcase the far-left’s attempts to marginalize and silence their critics, while spewing the same kind of vitriol they ironically claim should end.
I agree they jumped the shark. Like most things, they over used a tactic that worked a decade ago. But fortunately, most people cannot be fooled all the time. As they double down on this, I suspect it will backfire on them as everyone who is anyone of knowledge on this has already told them they are full of dookie.
I don’t run out and buy Preparation H just because I saw a commercial for it either….
…what kind of dumb shit listens to any of this crap and actually does it
You can’t protect the mental from themselves
Well, I guess we’re even then, I’m against the use of the guardian.