They need to cut funding to NOAA because NOAA has become an activist orginization and other NGOs should pick up the tab for their propaganda agencies such as NOAA and NASA along with EPA!
Due to known errors this decade tied with the 30s and there was no statistically significant difference in reported temperatures as all the temperatures in the last century have fallen within the known errors that are inherent in equipment and methods.
Isn’t it amazing how such a record can come in the midst of one of the three coldest ice ages in the last 600 million years? Click here to examine the citations for the data sources.
Real Science 
They need to cut funding to NOAA because NOAA has become an activist orginization and other NGOs should pick up the tab for their propaganda agencies such as NOAA and NASA along with EPA!
Due to known errors this decade tied with the 30s and there was no statistically significant difference in reported temperatures as all the temperatures in the last century have fallen within the known errors that are inherent in equipment and methods.
The fix was in.
i am sure if you look at an actual record from any specific (non-UHI) location, it would tell a different story.
Isn’t it amazing how such a record can come in the midst of one of the three coldest ice ages in the last 600 million years? Click here to examine the citations for the data sources.
Isn’t it amazing how the significance of the latest data is in the eye of the beholder?
If our top sceintists say so with the blessing of their peers, it must be so, even if they are all feeding from the exact same trough!