It isn’t natural because it isn’t happening.
h/t to Marc Morano
Nothing, but nothing you point out will make John Cook finally see the light. Wake up and smell the coffee! The climate is changing but no longer in the direction the Warmists want; this is the real inconvenient truth.
Cook is someone to be ignored. He and his people think computer models are “evidence”.
Why the label? What are you pointing out with “Evangelical Christian”?
There was a story a some months ago that it isn’t just people in the left wing of politics, but it is also conservatives and Christians, who are believers in global warming. It was a lame attempt to try to change the image of global warming. I myself thought it was cheap, shallow, and transparent.
I love the Orwellian name of Cook’s website, “skepticalscience.”
In GoddardLand, dana (an American) is John (an Australian).
And in GoddardLand, one simply must ignore the actual heat flows (measured well by, say, sea level rise?) and ignore all evidence and the statistics that show that a short term measurement of atmospheric temperatures is a retarded way of claiming that global warming doesn’t exist.
And in alarmist land, no one ever has anything intelligent to say.
a short term measurement
Ok. Then let’s start in the Medieval Warm Period 1000 years ago.
Climate looters are selling climate dispensation and business couldn’t be better. Fleecing adherents of climate religiosity is so easy that much of the carbon trading scam is run by organized crime.
Your Trendline is not statistically significant even at the 75%.
Also note you’re using Hadley which has been shown by Roman M (a skeptic!) to undersample the warming according to the European Center for Medium and Long Range Forecasting.
You are the epitome of a cherry picker. No wonder you’ll never publish anything.
But the Moscow heatwave last July was proof of global warming
Steve, even cooling is proof of warming. Is why we had that bitter cold earlier this winter………see? All weather events are proof of warming.
Steve, you know, Lubos posted a detailed debunking of that Skeptical Science article. Maybe you could post that as well.
So you’re saying using imaginary thermometers like GISS does is better? How would that not be cherry picking? Maybe we should go to a third party……..oh wait…..
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 847 other followers
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.