Name Date Intensity at landfall ---- ---- ---------------------
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
- The World’s Greatest Climate Scientist Speaks Out
- Startling New Revelation
- Just An Illusion
- Climate Conditioning
- Fact Checking Reuters
- No Correlation
- I Offended Their Religion
- The High Priest Has Forbidden Questioning His Religion
- Hiding And Rewriting History
- 97% Of Scientists Agree
- Fact Free Economist
- Academic Tipping Points
- Desperate Academics
- Climate Misinformation
- Unreliable And Toxic
- Unreliable And Toxic
- Fossil Fuels To End Risotto
- HG Wells “CHANGES IN THE WORLD’S CLIMATE” 1920
- SCIENCE : THE ICE AGE COMETH?
- Climate Misinformation
- “Goodbye New York. Goodbye Washington”
Email Subscription
Join 1,940 other subscribersRecent Comments
lol, intensity and frequency!
With Bob’s analysis (http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/02/23/the-recent-drop-in-the-sea-surface-temperatures-of-u-s-coastal-waters/) it will be a lot longer…
Actually, I would think the opposite! Severe weather generally requires a clash of warm and cold air masses (with lots of other ingredient too).
At least that is what we were taught at Environment Canada many years ago, when I worked for them(before CAGW came around)….but then, that is just my opinion…
the fact that the water around the USA is cold won’t allow it to sustain long, but the fact that you would have very distinct air masses north and south of the cold waters…just a thought…
Keep em coming Steve, I see the water level above the chin.
Where’s Tony Duncan with some poorly thought out comment on this?
Here I spent the day reading Climate etc and the Hurricane issue was “always on my mind” while reading that site because of past claims from GT!
{pfffffftt! spilt ma beer!}
Great angle and creative thinking. You *must* exploit this.