Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
- Toto Has Moved!
- Cooling Nuuk
- Escape The Heat At Your Local Movie Theater
- Charles Butler Interview – May 2, 2016
- Massive Greenland Fraud Is Rapidly Growing
- More Detail On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- 1995 IPCC Report Showed No Troposphere Warming From 1958 To 1995
- More On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- Climate Hustle Today
- On The Air Monday
- NOAA Quadrupling Radiosonde Temperatures By Data Tampering
- Skiing Is A Thing Of The Past
- Alarmist Brains Depleted Of Oxygen
- Climate Scam Being Driven By Politicians/Actors/Journalists
- 1905 : Valdez, Alaska Relocated Due To Glacial Melting
- Today’s Climate Fraud Winners – Science News
- Most Influential Climate Denier On Twitter
- SCIENCE : 230 Years Of Blaming White Men For Climate Change
- Battling Climate Misinformation In Santa Fe
- 1906 : Belief In Climate Change Is Due To Defective Memories
- Oswald’s Rifle?
- The Arctic Is Ice Free – How Can Sea Ice Be Declining?
- Climate Hustle Next Monday – One Night Only
- The Surface Temperature Record Is A Farce
- NASA – Doubling Sea Level Rise By Data Tampering
-
Join 1,965 other subscribers
Recent Comments
Blue State vs. Red State
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
CA and TX track each other well in the 2001-2007 region. Before and after that, CA is higher unless you go back as far as 1991. I think a comparison to Washington might be better, as TX and WA track each other much better until recently.
Or heck, use CO. CO unemployment was lower than TX pretty much the entire time (1990 onward) until 2008…wasn’t that around the time we switched from red to blue?
-Scott
Blue states have more people that have been bullied and victimized by white males.
you need to qualify that with, “perceived bullying, and victimization, because someone told them they were before they even knew they were”
That’s because a lot of Texans are working in wind farms nowadays
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11837896
“But the Mayor of Sweetwater, Greg Wortham, puts me right on that. Support for wind energy, he explains, is based on the jobs and wealth generated.
A single wind turbine can earn a landowner $10,000 a year. A field of cotton can more than double its revenue if turbines are planted.
It’s popular – but whatever you do, don’t mention the climate, say Mr Wortham. It’s too polarising.
“Carbon footprint, green, climate change – those issues are so charged in the US that really the fact that this produces energy and revenue… and other things we say we’re for, there are just certain labels that cause people to form into groups. ”
Perhaps California can follow Texas’ good example?
Andy
Out riding the range rounding up the turbine parts which fly off.
I’d guess that is not what they mainly do.
Andy