Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
- Toto Has Moved!
- Cooling Nuuk
- Escape The Heat At Your Local Movie Theater
- Charles Butler Interview – May 2, 2016
- Massive Greenland Fraud Is Rapidly Growing
- More Detail On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- 1995 IPCC Report Showed No Troposphere Warming From 1958 To 1995
- More On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- Climate Hustle Today
- On The Air Monday
- NOAA Quadrupling Radiosonde Temperatures By Data Tampering
- Skiing Is A Thing Of The Past
- Alarmist Brains Depleted Of Oxygen
- Climate Scam Being Driven By Politicians/Actors/Journalists
- 1905 : Valdez, Alaska Relocated Due To Glacial Melting
- Today’s Climate Fraud Winners – Science News
- Most Influential Climate Denier On Twitter
- SCIENCE : 230 Years Of Blaming White Men For Climate Change
- Battling Climate Misinformation In Santa Fe
- 1906 : Belief In Climate Change Is Due To Defective Memories
- Oswald’s Rifle?
- The Arctic Is Ice Free – How Can Sea Ice Be Declining?
- Climate Hustle Next Monday – One Night Only
- The Surface Temperature Record Is A Farce
- NASA – Doubling Sea Level Rise By Data Tampering
Recent Comments
John on The Price Of Telling The Truth… Don Gaddes on Seven Year Drought Killed 40%… Bill Sokeland on NSIDC : Arctic Was Ice Free In… Notes To Ponder on 45 Years Since Paul Ehrlich Wa… gator69 on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… gator69 on Toto Has Moved! Menicholas on Toto Has Moved! Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Ed Darrell on Phil Jones Removing The 1940…
Piers : “The level of their science is nonsense”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

What about the tree rings? Why don’t you talk about the tree rings?
Oh, that’s right. The tree ring data was “accidentally” erased by the “scientists” who found the tree ring temperature data inconveniently truthful, and substituted “actual” temperature readings when the tree ring data stubbornly refused to support assertions of rising temperatures.
The AGW industry won’t let a few facts stand in the way of their messianic determination to save the planet by robbing taxpayers blind. Nor will academics refute myths that generate billions in government grants.
Of course, we must respect scientific fact. Thanks, by the way, for supplying a few.
How about the fact that there has never been any scientific proof that trees even make good thermometers, or poor ones for that matter. It is all speculation.
Hey Steven, if you are going to quote someone, you could at least provide a link back to the source material. Piers, who?