California Wine Industry Calls Alarmists On Their BS

On behalf of the wine industry in Napa Valley, we need to take a moment to help clarify several of the points noted in your article “Sustainable growth: Weathering climate change with Napa Valley’s grapegrowers” in the Sunday, March 20, 2011, paper. There are a number of topics touched on and intertwined that provided a lot of confusion for the reader.

In the introduction, the vineyard manager is talking about the 2010 growing season and the writer interprets the comments made to that unique site as indicative of the entire appellation. The 2010 vintage overall was cooler than normal, and except for a three-day heat spike, a “typical” vintage appellation-wide. The challenges presented by the hot spell stemmed from the overall season being cooler in that growers had purposefully thinned the vine canopies (thinned leaves) to open the vines up to better ripen the grape clusters. With the grapes exposed, without shading from the leaves, there was some sunburn of clusters in some vineyards around the valley. But clearly not all, as the grapes that made it to the valley’s wineries are largely viewed as quality vintage. Napa growers typically thin at least half the crop and the 2010 harvest still ended being one of the three largest of the decade. So the notion that this sunburn problem was wide-spread and devastating as noted at this Treasury vineyard is not true

Secondly, the writer talks about climate change as being the reason for this hot spell. The recent growing season had just three days over 100 degrees compared to a typical growing season having between 10 and 14 days over 100. While we appreciate the writer noting that the Napa Valley Vintners commissioned the most extensive climate research in the industry and writing that the research team has not found rising temperatures outside of some winter to early summer increase of just one degree in overnight temperatures to date, the science proves that climate change that would change grape phenology has not happened. We are not being “deniers,” but simply put, those who enjoy wine cannot be tasting climate change in Napa Valley wines.

And finally, I would like to offer thanks for making readers aware of many of the great attributes of the Napa Green land and winery programs that make them the most comprehensive and stringent in wine industry. But, just to clarify — cover crops for soil conservation and evolved chemical management, to name just a couple of the Napa Green best practices — these practices are preserving and protecting the Napa Valley today and are not in response to climate change (since it is yet to occur), but to make sure the Napa Valley continues to be the premier winegrowing capital in America and a leader in the world in producing innovative, quality-driven wines.

Bruce Cakebread is president, of Cakebread Cellars in Rutherford.


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to California Wine Industry Calls Alarmists On Their BS

  1. Justa Joe says:

    Wow… The warmists will stop at nothing. Everyone knows that the Sacramento area had a mild summer.

  2. Andy Weiss says:

    Weather is never totally perfect. In fact some year might be hotter than normal.

  3. Amino Acids in Meteorites says:


    people in the real world telling the scientists their thingy isn’t happening.

  4. suyts says:

    That’s some good butt-hurt for the warmistas!

  5. Tourist in Chief says:

    So I take it the original story read: Searing Furnace of Climate Change chars Napa harvest to a crisp, all wine destroyed. See! It’s worse than we thought. And maybe Cakebread was just a bit concerned about the marketing aspect of this message.

  6. papertiger says:

    Napa wine is a staple in Moron County er, Marin County.

    Coming from a vintner like that ‘ll make it sting. What to do?

    There must be a product specifically for an occasion like this, geared to the metrosexual market.

    I got it. Lady’s Anti Monkeybutt powder. Just the thing.

    Oh. that bit about a hot spell in California this last summer – the vintner used very specific language to describe it. I appreciate that. Too many goons in the media tried to build up a three day hot spell in September and sell it as a “heatwave”. Like this one; LOS ANGELES (AP) — California’s blistering fall heat wave sent temperatures to an all-time record high of 113 degrees Monday in downtown Los Angeles, and many sought refuge at the beach or in the shade. Downtown hit 113 degrees for a few minutes at about 12:15 p.m., breaking the old all-time record of 112 degrees set on June 26, 1990,

    What sort of “heatwave” peaks at 12:15 p.m.? And only lasts two days (just the 26th and 27th of September – then temp went back to normal the next day)?

  7. Dave N says:

    Bah.. as if the growers themselves would know! It’s up to climate scientists to tell them whether or not their crops are affected!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s