I forecast that Dr. Muller will continue to play the role of neutral observer, and will continue to shock us with revelations that climate change is “worse than he expected.”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
I forecast that Dr. Muller will continue to play the role of neutral observer, and will continue to shock us with revelations that climate change is “worse than he expected.”
Real Science 
I concur: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/03/31/expect-the-best-plan-for-the-worst/#comment-633648 and here: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/03/22/the-not-evil-just-romm-2-solution/#comment-626610.
This is my forecast and we’re still on track for it (whatever the American climate neurosis appears to be telling…)
Truly nuetral observers in a dispute normally try to find some middle ground, certainly not go to an even more extreme position. The lipstick is off this pig.
I am deeply suspicious of Dr. Muller. I suspect he is simply looking to fill a power vacuum in the alarmist world. Muller was spot on in demolishing Michael Mann and his Hockey Stick fraud. However, most of his views on climate change are easily debunked mainstream alarmist cliches.
“I am deeply suspicious of Dr. Muller. I suspect he is simply looking to fill a power vacuum in the alarmist world”
Ditto – I get this snake-in-the-grass feeling..
http://jer-skepticscorner.blogspot.com/2011/04/best-novim-and-other-solution.html
Erik,
So…
Is Muller just another wannabe corrupt crony capitalist cut from the same cloth as GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt?
So far, I have only skimmed your link. I will examine in more detail later. It appears your reaction to Muller’s full presentation was much the same as mine. Nice work!
In my previous comment, I mistakenly plugged in Erik as the name rather than SBVOR — my bad. Kindly delete that comment and publish this one:
Erik,
So…
Is Muller just another wannabe corrupt crony capitalist cut from the same cloth as GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt?
So far, I have only skimmed your link. I will examine in more detail later. It appears your reaction to Muller’s full presentation was much the same as mine. Nice work!
I see no middle of the road or any attempt to be neutral! This guy is like other “Luke Warmers” They are attempting to disguise their Chicken Little , Precautionary Principle, Bullshit. I have more respect for the true believers like Phil Jones or Trenberth. They think the end justify the means so they are trying to be effective rather than truthful!
Like Andy says: There is not even any attempt to pretty up the PIG!
You mean they have something up their “neutral position” sleeve?
Too bad they can’t find enough solid science to be out in the open and shout it from the housetops.
Like Lindzen says “You’re compromising the most fundamental belief I have in Democracy…..”
Why are people surprised when an employee of a company that sells a product (climate science courses) to a customer (students)….
…does not bash the product
Completely agreed. I live near a school with 4 year degrees in wildlife biology, environmental studies, etc. and I’ve always suspected that graduates rarely found jobs in their fields (I know of a couple of anecdotal cases).
http://www.careers.wwu.edu/SurveyApplication0809/SearchBachelorXStudentX.aspx
Found the above site that allows you to look up employment rates at WWU. Not a pretty picture for those who have chosen “Environmental Propoganda” as their major.