Climate scientists will nitpick endlessly about irrelevant details of skeptic arguments, while completely ignoring the 1-3 order of magnitude nonsensical claims of alarmists.
Why is that?
It fits the Agenda of their puppet masters. They need to receive “Marching Orders” before they attack anything. They actually remind me of an ant colony or a bee hive!
It is a good display of Tribalism!
Because of current ACTUAL events and a few old articles showing up, that quiet smile is showing on my face
It has ever been the way
of the hopeless hypocrite;
when his reason will not sway,
he must baffle with bullshit.
In their tax payer financed confabs that they’re constantly having they’re instructed to never deviate from their message of impending global catastrophe. They call it staying on message. Guys like the late Stevie Schneider implored the minions to not be concerned with actual facts. The message of “Climate Justice®” ala socialism must remain pure and on point.
! SHIFT the POWER !
They have taken sides. That is not what the “scientific method” is all about! When their bias becomes so painfully obvious, they cease to be scientists and become hired shills or propagandists.
Because they place ideology ahead of truth and discovery. Snow decreasing/increasing because of warmer winters is a great example. Treeometers is another. Steig/O’Donnell is a great study as to what goes through a climatologist’s mind. It is the results that matter to them. Methodology means nothing. Why does it take skeptics to point out the Himalayas alarmism wasn’t a science study? Or that the Amazon fragility wasn’t a reality either.
It is the ideology that runs this discipline of “science”.
SUYTS says – “It is the results that matter to them.”
I would modify that to say, it is presenting the results that tell the story they want told that matter to them. Which is all perfectly correct to Post-normal scientists.
Agreed, I was trying to be charitable for the more sensitive readers here.
That’s right, climatologists are advocates first, they are scientists second. Remember, the claims that the Himalayan glaciers would be melted away in 25 years stood unquestioned in the IPCC AR4 report for 3 full years and climate science said nothing. Actually all science was silent for 3 years. I don’t know if it was out of fear or ignorance. Unbelievable.
Yes, that is an unbelievable story of a thoroughly corrupted science. Not to mention Trenberth’s unsupportable claims about hurricanes.
Why has “peer review” allowed obvious scientific fraud to flourish?
Andy, because peer literally translates to someone in the same boat you are in.
It is because Malthusian Marxism is an obsessive cult. Converts literally are co-opted as part of the collective, to chant the mantra and obfuscate by any means necessary: Moral or educational superiority, authority, omission, deception, fraud, bribery or violence.
This is a critical point, showing that these people are not for real. Otherwise, they would be quick to censure ridiculous statements about catastrophic effects of the limited global warming that has occurred in the last 200 years or so. (I have seen some warmists do this, but it’s not common.)
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Google account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Twitter account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Facebook account.
( Log Out /
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 1,974 other followers
Sign me up!