Canberra Has Not Warmed Over The Last 100 Years

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/

No wonder Julia is hysterical.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Canberra Has Not Warmed Over The Last 100 Years

  1. Bruce says:

    Amazing how many red bits are next to grey bits. GISS uses 1250 km smoothing you said? Astounding coincidence!

  2. Chris Cox says:

    Looks like we’re in a period of European/Asian warming…bit like the Medieval Warm Period, eh?

  3. I tried taking the timescale back to 1880 and much of the warming vanishes.
    http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2011&month_last=04&sat=4&sst=0&type=anoms&mean_gen=0112&year1=1880&year2=2010&base1=1951&base2=1980&radius=250&pol=reg
    I opted for the 250km smooth – no ocean – exposes their dodgy warming in Siberia and surreal grid cells over Spitzbergen.

  4. Tom Harley says:

    That little white spot on the NW of Oz is Broome, not warming here either

  5. Ozboy says:

    Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive…

  6. Another Ian says:

    Steve, I dobbed you – see

    http://blogs.news.com.au/couriermail/andrewbolt/index.php/couriermail/comments/gillard_feels_a_chill/#commentsmore

    And, among the comments, you might like the list at

    “CraigR replied to Maggie the global warming guru Thatcher
    Wed 01 Jun 11 (11:45am)
    The theory is every changing with what-ever the climatic weather we have or whether we have any climatic weather or not is the climatic weather we do or not will be the climatic weather man causes.
    So the climatic weather we have or not is the “Anthropogenic Climate Change “theory we have.

    If a slight warming is occurring it does not prove causation, however a cooling disproves the theory that man’s CO2 is the cause of a warming ….a large portion of AGW advocates claim that it’s all ways up, up and away. You simple can’t continually change the ‘Theory” to suit the circumstances otherwise it’s a self falsifying theory.

    anti-AGW crown constantly misrepresent what AGW is?

    Misrepresent ???? who’s doing that….. the constant relabeling over the years is amazing …..

    Global cooling (GC)
    Global dimming (GD)
    Global warming (GW)
    Man-made global warming (MGW)
    Anthropogenic global warming (AGW)
    Dangerous global warming (DGW)
    Greenhouse effect (GE)
    Human induced climate change (HICC)
    Human caused climate change (HCCC)
    Runaway greenhouse effect (RGE)
    Climate change (CC)
    Global Climate change (GCC)
    Climatic Destabilization (CD)
    Dangerous climate change (DCC)
    Abrupt climate change (ACC)
    Anthropogenic climate change (ACC)
    Catastrophic climate change (CCC)
    Catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW)
    Global heating (GH)
    Climate crisis (CC)
    Climate destabilization (CD)
    Global wierding (GW)
    Climate chaos (CC)
    Inadvertent climate modification (ICM)
    Climate challenge (CC)
    Climate disruption (CD)
    Global climate disruption (GCD) “

  7. EH Lee says:

    Another Ian, loved the list, and don’t forget:

    Climate Emergency

  8. Charlie says:

    Can we really be accurate to 0.5 of a degree, even with all the sampling number of data points ? Are we even sure a degree resolution reflects reality? If that map had -0.5 to +0.5 as ‘white – no change’ then most of it would be white. Its amazing how much of the red is in areas with next to no measurement too.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s