Intellectuals Discuss Sarah

She is so dumb. Yea everybody knows that. And really scary. Yes very scary, she wants all of us to die in the rapture. Definitely, she is dumber and scarier than Bush. She wants to force everyone to be Christian. For sure, and she thinks she can see Russia from her house. She had her daughter’s baby. Totally, and her daughter got pregnant. If she gets elected I’m moving to Canada. She is so scary. And dumb. Tina Fey told me.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

51 Responses to Intellectuals Discuss Sarah

  1. Ill wind blowing says:

    Christian Dominionism;

    A religious movement that wants to infiltrate all aspects of American Society (ie Government, military, education etc). and to transform the United States government into a theocracy governed by Old Testament laws. Examples would be the execution of “unchaste” women; idol worshippers; sabbath breakers. I highly recommend researching Dominionism the greatest threat to America that no one has heard of.

    http://www.theocarcywatch.org

    Oh yes! What does this have to do with Sarah Palin? Listen closely to this Dominionist’ Minister’s sermon about infiltrating society, then . . . Blessed be Sarah.

    http://www.vimeo.com/18721755

    • Dear Ill Wind Blowing (if that’s really your name),

      Your incompetence

      • Ill wind blowing says:

        “Dear Ill Wind Blowing (if that’s really your name),
        Your incompetence”

        You mean incompetent.

        And as for your bizarre assumption that I’m suggesting thatmy Nom de Plume is my literal name what can I say? OK, I thought of something appropriate to that statement: “Of course that’s my real name. Did you not know that my mama had a sense of humor?”

      • Dear Ill Wind Blowing,

        Your inability to parse plain words in the English language not withstanding, you’re an incompetent boob. If you didn’t post six-hundred-word comments consisting mostly of non-sequiturs and blood libel there might be a point in answering your charges. Until then, rave on, tool.

  2. Ill wind blowing says:

    Christian Dominionism;

    A religious movement that wants to infiltrate all aspects of American Society (ie Government, military, education etc). and to transform the United States government into a theocracy governed by Old Testament laws. Examples would be the execution of “unchaste” women; idol worshippers; sabbath breakers. I highly recommend researching Dominionism the greatest threat to America that no one has heard of.

    http://www.theocracy watch.o r g

    Oh yes! What does this have to do with Sarah Palin? Listen closely to this Dominionist’ Minister’s sermon about infiltrating society, then . . . Blessed be Sarah.

    • in posting your insane drivel aside, I’ve been alive for more than a third of a century, and involved in various churches for as long, as well, of numerous denominations. Why is it that the only place I have ever heard of “Christian Dominionism” is from lying marxist agitators? Note that I am, in fact, intelligent enough to see instantly what is intended by the term. But even with having regular, close contact with Presbyterians, Lutherans, Catholics, Episcopalians, Methodists, Mennonites, Amish, Plymouth Brethren, Pentecostals, Baptists, & Southern Baptists (among others) I’ve never once, among the literal thousands of people I’ve met come across the concept that you imply is such a danger to religious freedom.

      Are you and your marxist ilk perhaps cutting a figure from whole cloth?

      • Ill wind blowing says:

        “Why is it that the only place I have ever heard of “Christian Dominionism” is from lying marxist agitators? “

        Because you have done your usual intensive non-research. Let me recommend the following:
        Google! Google is your friend. Google is good for you. Google Dominion Christianity; Reconstructionism; Rushdoony.

        OK. I’ll spoon feed you but just a few of spoonfuls but be a big boy and research things yourself.

        Links broken:
        A brief explanation of their objective by one of them: sermonaudio com/playpopup.asp?SID=71909182461

        A fuller explanation advocating theocracy. Listen to the whole thing:, particularly at the 3:56 mark:: sermonaudio com/playpopup.asp?SID=4305221127

        More entertainment from the barbarians: sermonaudio com/search.asp?keyworddesc=Theonomy&keyword=theonomy

        As for your utterly moronic statement about my being a Marxist, you neither know who nor what I am; let alone what a real Marxist is. It is you and your ilk who lump everything together in order to conform to your one dimensional concept of the Universe.

      • Amino Acids in Meteorites says:

        You are saying the same thing over and over Ill wind blowing. That is spamming. Stop spamming Ill wind blowing

  3. Ill wind blowing says:

    Sorry for the triple post. I was going to break a link.

    Christian Dominionism;

    A religious movement that wants to infiltrate all aspects of American Society (ie Government, military, education etc). and to transform the United States government into a theocracy governed by Old Testament laws. Examples would be the execution of “unchaste” women; idol worshippers; sabbath breakers. I highly recommend researching Dominionism the greatest threat to America that no one has heard of.

    theocracywatch org

    Oh yes! What does this have to do with Sarah Palin? Listen closely to this Dominionist’ Minister’s sermon about infiltrating society, then . . . Blessed be Sarah.

  4. bkivey says:

    Except for the part about ‘Idol worshippers’, that sounds a lot like an Islamic Caliphate, something that actually is happening in Western Europe. Perhaps someone could explain why the Left gets so worked up about the strawman of a right-wing theocracy, but nary a peep on the very real Islamic usurpation of liberal Western democracies.

  5. Latitude says:

    Black Liberation Theology
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_liberation_theology
    Reverend Jeremiah Wright
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright

    sorry, it was so obvious someone had to do it……………………..

    • suyts says:

      lol, was saving that. I’m sure IWB has posted many comments throughout the web highly critical of the anti-American church Obama attended for over 20 years that married the pres and his wife. And that the beliefs of Rev Wright are obviously equivalent to the beliefs of Obama. I know he’s done that else he’d be showing a misogynist nature and a bigotry against conservatives and Christians alike.

      • Latitude says:

        amen…………………………..

      • Ill wind blowing says:

        I guess Obama’s church compares to those who want to stone (Gary North’s preferred method of execution) “unchaste” women; non-Christians; idol worshipers (that includes Catholics by their definition; blasphemers (Gaaawd darn!), and anything else the Moldy Testament (nullified in the Epistles) considers worthy of death.

        But then some just don’t have the curiosity to see anything outside of their rigid ideology.

      • suyts says:

        But then some just don’t have the curiosity to see anything outside of their rigid ideology.

        Indeed, IWB, indeed.

      • P.J. says:

        “idol worshipers (that includes Catholics by their definition;”

        Catholics are idol worshipers? Based on what? I can’t wait to hear your response to this one.

  6. Latitude says:

    Steve, my last post is in moderation hell……………………………..

  7. Ill wind blowing says:

    It’s sad to see that no one on this thread is capable of responding to the issue and do nothing but engage in Ad Hominem attacks.

    • Oh, cry me a river, you poor, put upon thing. You haven’t made a single substantial claim, just ordered people to search google.com for some random marxist nonsense. Google the term “Lon Nol”, google the term “Pol Pot”, google the term “дело врачей”, google the term “六四事件”.

      Until you can substantiate in some way that your insane marxist “Christian Dominionism” is anything more than a flimsy pretext for blood libel, you’re going to be rightfully mocked. You’re nothing but a smear merchant and a liar.

      • Amino Acids in Meteorites says:

        Ill wind blowing has a mind filled with political propaganda. And he wonders why no one takes him seriously.

    • Amino Acids in Meteorites says:

      No one pays attention to you Ill wind blowing because you are worth paying attention to.

    • suyts says:

      It’s sad to see that no one on this thread is capable of responding to the issue and do nothing but engage in Ad Hominem attacks.

      HOLY CRAP!!!! YOU MORON, YOUR ATTACK WAS NOTHING BUT AD HOMINEN!
      And, as I pointed out earlier, misogynist nature and bigotry is transparent.
      Your slanderous nature isn’t worth discussion beyond world condemnation.

    • P.J. says:

      @Ill WInd: You say, “It’s sad to see that no one on this thread is capable of responding to the issue and do nothing but engage in Ad Hominem attacks”. When you call Catholics “idol worshippers”, insult southerners (Gaaawd darn) and Judaism and Christianity in general (Moldy Testament), what did you expect in return? You reap what you sow. When you first appeared on this site, I posted a comment in which I complimented you on your civil tone. After the above display (which I can only describe as bigoted), I take it back. If you want to insult the faiths that built Western society, so be it. I can only hope that one day you will appreciate that those faiths gave you the very freedom you now use to insult them in the first place.

      • Ill wind blowing says:

        It’s obvious that you don’t focus well on what you read. It is Dominionists and Fundamentalist in general that consider Catholics idol worshipers. I personally don’t care about how they carry out their religion but the Assemblies of God churches that Palin belongs to are the ones who demonize Catholics and many others.

        As for the true object of my insults, it is the Theocratic Dominionists that want to create a nation based on something equivalent to the worst Sharia law in kind but even worse in degree.

        If you are offended because I made fun of the Old Testament then please see why I consider it reprehensible:

        Deuteronomy 25:11-12 New International Version
        11 If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, 12 you shall cut off her hand. Show her no pity.

        How can someone of moral perception stomach let alone respect such an abomination of a “godly” law? Even the people instructed to carry out that despicable law had to be commanded to “show her no pity”; That implies that they had more morality than the priesthood that invented these laws and the demon god of their Theocratic imagination.

        When I was very young I was in a religion with similar teachings. I found it revolting and got myself thrown out of it. As a result, I have a burning hatred of the “Theocratic:” mentality no matter which religion adopts it. And why should I be condemned for that when everyone is going crazy exagerating the influence of truly Theocratic Muslims in the US but are blind to Dominionism’s invisible influence?

        How lucky I am that “TruePatriot” answer me below in “Dominionist” style. Please see his post below.

      • Latitude says:

        quick question:
        If the wife’s husband is being attacked…
        …why would she grab her husband by the balls?

      • P.J. says:

        @Ill WInd: “Deuteronomy 25:11-12 New International Version
        11 If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, 12 you shall cut off her hand. Show her no pity.”

        That was the “Law of the Desert” as it were many centuries ago. Do you seriously think anyone these days takes that to the letter of the law and carries it out? How many Jews or Christians have you heard of lately cutting off a woman’s hand? If they did, yes it would be reprehensible.

        “And why should I be condemned for that when everyone is going crazy exagerating the influence of truly Theocratic Muslims in the US but are blind to Dominionism’s invisible influence?”

        The influence of Theocratic Muslims in the US isn’t that strong … yet. It is in Europe (hence Geert Wilders warning to America to not go down that path), and in places like Saudi Arabia they do cut off peoples’ hands, and in some cases, their heads. As for Dominionism, invisible is the correct word … they are just that. Had you not mentioned it, I wouldn’t have even heard of it. It seems to me you are grossly overstating thier influence. As for Theocratic Muslims, they are in the minority but the ones that do act have no problem killing others for their beliefs, even if it means taking their own life in the process. In that regard, I would agree with you – that is definitely repugnant.

        P.S. By quoting these two verses from the Old Testament and calling it reprehensible is, IMHO, cherrypicking … is it not?

  8. truepatriot says:

    re sillywind.

    you despise religon just because it undermines your godless science. true science was founded on christianity. you attack sarah palin because shw exposes the lies of your science. the world cant warm its designed by god to have negative feedback which means co2 is absorbed before it reaches the atmosphere.

  9. truepatriot says:

    btw illwind christians will retake the control eventually and when we do disbelievers like you who defile our children with ideas that condemn them to hell will be hunted down and imprisoned. at best.

    • Ill wind blowing says:

      Thank you very much for showing everyone on this board an example of Dominionist/Theocratic thinking.

      Your murderous desire to kill anyone that doesn’t bow down to your religion is noted.

      The only response to your death threats against non Christians (by your definition of Christian) lies right here:

  10. Paul H says:

    “Dear Ill Wind Blowing (if that’s really your name),……..

    And as for your bizarre assumption that I’m suggesting thatmy Nom de Plume is my literal name what can I say? OK, I thought of something appropriate to that statement: “Of course that’s my real name. Did you not know that my mama had a sense of humor

    Don’t worry Ill, it could be worse. I once knew someone called Tony Duncan!

  11. PhilJourdan says:

    Ill wind blowing says:
    June 16, 2011 at 6:40 am
    It’s sad to see that no one on this thread is capable of responding to the issue and do nothing but engage in Ad Hominem attacks.

    Respond to the issue? The issue is the ignorance of intellectuals when talking about someone they do not like! Your posts have all been ad hominems! You are a sad troll! Who wants to destroy that which they fear and do not understand. The only relevance you have is in hate. You are a sad caricature of the left, and a good poster boy for them.

    • suyts says:

      Well stated. And it is sad. IWB seems to be capable of offering interesting points to speak about from time to time, but he isn’t interested in dialogue or a furtherance of understanding. He’s interested in slurring and spewing hate and vitriol.

      Character assassination it never gets old for some.

      @IWB, out of the 24,000 pages of e-mails, did you see anything in there about Palin plotting to overthrow the government and replacing it with a theocracy? As governor of Alaska, did she move to restrict the rights of free expression of religion or the right to abstain from it? No?

      Then your offering has no relevance or bearing and only serves to slur not just a person, but the message is clear, if you are a conservative female, the left will attack, slur and slander to the point of wishing rape upon her minor children. Worse, the left will also attack the free exercise of Christianity, the very religion this nation was founded upon. And more, it seems the left is desirous to be able to pick and choose who the right wishes to run for political office……aided and abetted by powerful forces of the media.

      Your worried about a fringe group wishing to instill a theocracy? I’m worried about a significantly larger group of treasonous people wishing to destroy our Constitution and extract the freedoms that we all enjoy from it.

      • glacierman says:

        Thank you James for the last paragraph!

      • Well, said, though I strongly doubt this “Christian Dominionism” merde is any less a figment of the marxist imagination than that so-called “Liberation Theology”. Ain’t it funny how they can call what is actually atheistic “Theology” and inherently enslaving “Liberation”.

  12. Blade says:

    [Ill wind blowing says:] “How lucky I am that “TruePatriot” answer me below in “Dominionist” style. Please see his post below.”

    Yes I noticed how ‘lucky’ you were 😉

    [Google] site:stevengoddard.wordpress.com “truepatriot”

    Results show one thread with those two posts above. Digging further, let’s see chronologically what IWB was submitting here around that time in 4 different threads …

    Ill wind blowing :: June 15, 2011 at 7:49 pm
    Ill wind blowing :: June 15, 2011 at 8:49 pm
    Ill wind blowing :: June 15, 2011 at 8:52 pm

    Ill wind blowing :: June 15, 2011 at 11:10 pm
    Ill wind blowing :: June 15, 2011 at 11:37 pm

    Ill wind blowing :: June 16, 2011 at 6:10 am
    Ill wind blowing :: June 16, 2011 at 6:13 am
    Ill wind blowing :: June 16, 2011 at 6:22 am
    Ill wind blowing :: June 16, 2011 at 6:26 am
    Ill wind blowing :: June 16, 2011 at 6:29 am
    Ill wind blowing :: June 16, 2011 at 6:31 am
    Ill wind blowing :: June 16, 2011 at 6:40 am
    Ill wind blowing :: June 16, 2011 at 6:50 am

    truepatriot :::::::::: June 16, 2011 at 11:09 am <—-
    truepatriot :::::::::: June 16, 2011 at 11:13 am <—-
    Ill wind blowing :: June 16, 2011 at 12:07 am
    Ill wind blowing :: June 16, 2011 at 12:10 am
    Ill wind blowing :: June 16, 2011 at 12:13 am

    Ill wind blowing :: June 16, 2011 at 11:46 pm
    Ill wind blowing :: June 16, 2011 at 11:56 pm

    We report, you decide 😉 Those rest period gaps (—) no doubt indicate the times that his medication was working, or he was busy [self-snip].

    Looks to me like a common tactic by the leftist activists. They plant posts at their enemies’ blogs and later pontificate there (or at some left-wing website) about how horrible that enemy blog is by pointing out these controversial comments easily found in the google cache. Usual planted posts include racist crap (N-word) or religious bigotry, but sometimes they will be death threats against famous people. It is all about Alinsky tactics, discrediting the enemy taken to a whole new level.

    As much as I despise Joe Romm and his ilk, such tactics would never occur to me and would I never do this to him or Tamino or any other AGW propagandist. Hell, I wouldn’t even do it to my worst enemies because it can easily lead to the feds involvement. But leftists are not bound by morals or ethics. Know thy enemy.

    To Ill wind blowing: Why don’t you come clean and ‘fess up. You or an associate planted the “truepatriot” posts. Come on, be a man. And remember, you’re under oath 😉

    And here’s a free clue for you: someone that can admit a mistake and apologize tends to garner a modicum of respect, which is substantially more than you have presently.

    • Ill wind blowing says:

      [Ill wind blowing says:] “How lucky I am that “TruePatriot” answer me below in “Dominionist” style. Please see his post below.”

      PJ responds:
      “To Ill wind blowing: Why don’t you come clean and ‘fess up. You or an associate planted the “truepatriot” posts. Come on, be a man. And remember, you’re under oath “

      WTF? You’re displaying the same paranoia that others in different websites have shown. In one website they like to claim that I am the reincarnation of half a dozen trolls. At first I was curious to see why one person in particular was so adamant. I checked the troll’s comments expecting that there must have been some similarity to mine. No similarity in writing style. When it got to the point where I was being accused of being every troll they had ever known I realized it was time to leave that nutty site.

      But you have another pattern (un)recognition problem. You go through the effort to track down every post I made in order to show what? I have “rest” periods in my posting! Goodness that’s so petty!

      I believe that I mentioned it here before; I jump from one site to another. One of those sites is not even a political website.

      As for your claiming that I planted truepatriot’s garbage not only is that another product of your feverish imagination but there are ways to check on that. I doubt that he lives in my general area; the chances are several hundred to one; so you can have Steve check our IP addresses. If he actually lives within 25 miles of my area I’ll gladly hunt him down.

      Also, his name sounds familiar, so I’m going to do some research when I have the time.

      Then there’s this jewel of a comment that you made. Unless you want to claim that I planted that one also.

      “But leftists are not bound by morals or ethics. Know thy enemy.”

      First, I’m not leftist but Conservatives, nowadays, seem to lump everyone outside of their ideology into one uber-category with a dozen names.

      Second, your comment says a lot about your mentality. Most of the ‘Leftist’ posts I read show alarm at the state of Conservatism nowadays. They’ve taken to sarcasm as a defense mechanism against what they consider, and rightly so, to be a demonic transformation taking place.

      Yet, I have never seen anything as vitriolic as the comments made by the far majority of the Right. Your comments and paranoia are a perfect example.

  13. Blade says:

    Re-posting my earlier comment from another thread to bolster the case and so that everyone knows who they are dealing with. And to any newcomers that see the comments by “truepatriot”, disregard them.

    “[RE: “truepatriot”] I smell a rat here Steve, and I mean besides Ill wind blowing (Villabolo).

    There is only that one [thread and 2 posts] here from that username, juvenile, non-punctuated, all lowercase, troll. Pretty much the trademark of a planted post. It appears conveniently right in the thread that has Ill wind blowing (Villaloblow) spouting his religious bigotry. If you ask me it is IWB or an associate.

    He plays games like this which is why Anthony IP banned him …”

    “[snip – trollobollo, aka Villabolo but keeps trying new fake names and fake emails anyway (others tried: “mecago” aka “enelcuno delatuya” aka “gaya hap”) – here’s a hint GH, you’ve been banned, and all further attempts from you will be snipped – Anthony]”

    I Should mention that IWB is also Terra Incognita. Quoting Anthony Watts …

    “REPLY: Ah Trollobolo aka Villabolo aka “mecago” aka “enelcuno delatuya” aka “gaya hap” from Van Nuys/North Hollywood is back. Proud of your pathetic dishonesty enough to post it at CP as a trophy comment I see. Such lack of scruples from the warmists flouting such dishonesty, you must be so proud. OK, we’ve upped the security just for you. Your IP address trick will no longer work to get around being banned. – Anthony”

    Hey IWB, the amazing thing is that you get yourself banned from the only places where people might endeavor to engage you and try to penetrate your thick skull. I see a lot of people like Smokey and Suyts trying to be reasonable but you have become that which you profess to despise, a bigot. You have a stunning magnitude of denseness even for a leftist troll. You are burning all the bridges back to reality.

    But none of this will make sense to you. Right?

  14. Blade says:

    Well I read the comment above, no surprise to me whatsoever. I should just stop here and leave it alone (starve a troll …), but I got a few minutes so I’ll just mention what that rambling response means to me.

    This is a known Troll, variously using the names Ill wind blowing, Villabolo, Terra Incognita, Trollobolo, trollobollo, mecago, enelcuno delatuya, gaya hap, (and just imagine how many more there are). He plagued Anthony Watts’ website to the point he was not just banned, but outed as someone using many handles, some of which we come across on other Climate websites. His non-response to a simple question above includes a veiled reference to voluntarily leaving some site (WUWT no doubt), this is denial. I posted the thread link above, anyone can see what happened, except for this troll himself. That doesn’t bode well for his mental health.

    Besides addressing the wrong commenter, even after clicking ‘reply’ on the right one, he falls back on the notion that other people, *not* him, are paranoid, a ridiculous use of a simple understandable word. When normal people see troll antics like spouting religious bigotry (on a great Climate blog of all places!) and then investigate what the knucklehead is up to, well to cast this as paranoia, is some weird rationalization indicating something disturbing I cannot relate to. It’s like those sick weirdos that yell foul things at military funerals and then wonder why folks are pissed off and angry. That peculiar rationalization is what I am referring to here. But whatever.

    I put forth a simple question: Did he or an associate conveniently plant that strawman comment? (a post unlike any other seen here: borderline threatening), a truly yes or no question. After much hemming and hawing and avoiding a direct answer, he says “As for your claiming that I planted …”, and then proceeds to not answer again, instead rambling about checking IP addresses even though the WUWT thread shows that changing IP addresses *is* the very point. Very strange indeed. I won’t elaborate on how IP changing is done so as to avoid telling him something he has yet to try, but needless to say it happens. But the real reason that trolls often fail is that they don’t know who are moderators on other forums and blogs (which does explain *their* paranoia for which they have very good reason).

    He then changes the subject multiple times, to ‘he will research the author of the planted post’ (ummmm, what?), something about jumping from one site to another (no kidding?), and to my own comment: “leftists are not bound by morals or ethics” (as if there is any dispute in the Alinsky era), and to the state of conservatism (whatever that is supposed to mean), advancing the proposition he is anything but a radical leftist propagandist. As folks view his comments on other forums like Romm’s (see the list of aliases) they will understand that is of course preposterous and no amount of post-fail re-posturing will change it. He could be Joe Romm for all we know. But who cares.

    So, YES or NO to that simple question was impossible for him and that is all I needed to see. It doesn’t matter to me what he says after this, I have no doubt that he or a friend *did* post that, but everyone else can make up their own mind. We report, you decide!. I offered what I thought was very valid reasoning about gaining a modicum of respect by coming clean and he chose to disregard it as I expected. You know why? Because underestimating the class and intentions of the good folks on this side of the debate is what the leftists always do (e.g., his type insanely disparages the TEA Party movement [elderly and middle-aged citizens!] and even Sarah Palin as evil). So what else could he do?

    This is far too long a comment about a meaningless troll (albeit an obnoxious religious bigot) whose life has to really suck as he watches the AGW scam being dismantled by the outstanding work of so many blogs and forums like this. But I do pity him somewhat because it will only get worse from here on out as the highwater mark came and went around Climategate, so for him and Joe Romm and their quest to use climate to further socialism each day will bring them closer to a psychotic break. And I bet it won’t be pretty.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s