Clinton Says He Is Pushing Weiner

Bill Clinton has also taken a direct role in pushing Weiner. The former president has reportedly been “livid” about Weiner’s behaviour, despite Clinton’s own history of sexual peccadilloes.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/

Advertisements

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Clinton Says He Is Pushing Weiner

  1. PhilJourdan says:

    There are just no bad puns/headlines or double entendre’s with a name like Weiner! Love it! I doubt clinton would have phrased it that way given his own “Lewinsky” moment!

  2. suyts says:

    Everyone knows that Weiner stuffed a cigar in his shorts for the pic. That’s what Clinton was so miffed about. Weiner was stealing his legacy.

  3. Latitude says:

    Clinton is such a self centered dolt….

  4. David Schofield says:

    He’s spent enough time pulling…

  5. Amino Acids in Meteorites says:

    Clinton has every right. After all rape is not as bad as sexting.

    SARC

  6. MikeTheDenier says:

    I love it . A serial rapist slamming the Weiner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  7. Al Gored says:

    Seriously funny.

    “Bill Clinton has also taken a direct role in pushing Weiner.”

    Every chance he gets.

    “The former president has reportedly been “livid” about Weiner’s behaviour…”

    Livid? More like ‘turgid’ or generally aroused.

  8. Justa Joe says:

    Oh yeah… I heard Chelsea Clinton was a Foster child.

  9. glacierman says:

    He is livid because Weiner admitted he did it and it was wrong. Never even brought up the vast right-wing conspiracy. No effort at all to blame it on his political enemies. I though this guy idolized Clinton. Clinton had a lot of the country believing he was the victim and he never would have admitted it if Monica would have got her dressed laundered.

    • “No effort at all to blame it on his political enemies.”

      Umm, does the phrase “obviously hacked” mean anything to you? The little shit tried for two weeks to blame it on everyone but himself. He lied to his wife, he lied to the congressional leadership, he lied to his party’s leaders, he lied to the reporters, he lied to his constituents, he lied to the sycophantic talking heads when he went onto the TV shows to talk about it. And then his sycophantic pals tried to pretend that it was all simultaneously a (criminal, mind you) hack, an orchestrated hoax, and “just about sex”.

      He tearfully confessed and then said, “To the best of my knowledge none of the women were underage” even after specifically targetting at least one high school junior. Whom he had met in person. When her high school toured the capitol.

      The guy’s not just a serial creep, he’s a sexual predator and everyone should know that despite the best efforts of the NYT, the Washington *spit* Post, MSNBC, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, NPR, PBS, & a whole host of their fellow travellers.

      • PhilJourdan says:

        Which actually directly answers glacierman. He did try it, but the old adage of “fool me once….” is in effect. It worked once. But most people do not like being made the fool, so while some would give him the benefit of the doubt for a time, they were not going to swallow his lies blindly like they did Clintons.

      • glacierman says:

        You have a point, but he was no where near as good at it as Slick Willy, which is why Bill is probably livid. Claiming he was hacked and/or it was a hoax may infer to some that it was a political enemy, but the Clinton’s actually said it knowing all along that the charges against Bill were accurate. They kept up their game for months. Bill had his wife out there blaming it the right wing, actively spinning and manipulating for his cause. Weiner’s wife works for Hillary, but apparently wasn’t going to actively manipulate the media. Maybe she doesn’t have political asperations and doesn’t need her husband to forge her career. Bill had Carville and the Forehead on cable every night blaming the messengers, etc. The MSM showed poles just about every hour to show how his job approval was good so everyone should just forget it. Maybe Phil is right, we are wise to it because of the Clintons, but I was just commenting on why Bill might be upset with him. It’s as if he learned nothing at all from his mentor.

      • PhilJourdan says:

        I have heard (but since I do not care, I have not delved into it) that Huma is the Clinton’s chit in this fight – so I suspect a divorce coming soon and that is why Bill wil not return Weiner calls. (He did when he was president). In any divorce, the first casuality are the mutual friends as they either have to chose a side or sit it out. And in the end, they usually lose them. The exceptions are the friends brought into the marriage (from before) and I think that is where the Clintons are.

      • glacierman says:

        Phil,

        Knowing Slick Willy, he is probably thinking ahead a year or so and going…..hmmmm a hot MILF on the market!

  10. Andy WeissDC says:

    Moral turpitude is not a Democrat vs. Republican issue, as there has been more then plenty on both sides of the aisle. If anything, the Republican indiscretions look worse, because they are supposedly the party of “family values”.

    • I forgot, what did Sarah Palin do?

    • Justa Joe says:

      I love this dodge. I guess we’re to presume that Democrats should approve of Weiner’s schtick. Afterall Weiner never actually came out against exhibitionism.

      How come the Donks never seem to go after AlGore regarding his lavish carbon footprint. Don’t his Carbon Indescretions look worse?

  11. Edward says:

    Bill Clinton, lecturing others on public decorum and behaviour – priceless, effin priceless – loved to have seen Hilary’s face when she heard of this article… has she not emasculated him yet?

  12. Jim Cole says:

    Clinton’s steamed because Weiner is getting the boot – – without even scoring the littlest bit of nookie.

    What a putz. If you’re gonna get tossed, at least get laid.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s