Greenpeace (aka IPCC) says coal is killing kids. Are they willing to put that to the test?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
- Toto Has Moved!
- Cooling Nuuk
- Escape The Heat At Your Local Movie Theater
- Charles Butler Interview – May 2, 2016
- Massive Greenland Fraud Is Rapidly Growing
- More Detail On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- 1995 IPCC Report Showed No Troposphere Warming From 1958 To 1995
- More On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- Climate Hustle Today
- On The Air Monday
- NOAA Quadrupling Radiosonde Temperatures By Data Tampering
- Skiing Is A Thing Of The Past
- Alarmist Brains Depleted Of Oxygen
- Climate Scam Being Driven By Politicians/Actors/Journalists
- 1905 : Valdez, Alaska Relocated Due To Glacial Melting
- Today’s Climate Fraud Winners – Science News
- Most Influential Climate Denier On Twitter
- SCIENCE : 230 Years Of Blaming White Men For Climate Change
- Battling Climate Misinformation In Santa Fe
- 1906 : Belief In Climate Change Is Due To Defective Memories
- Oswald’s Rifle?
- The Arctic Is Ice Free – How Can Sea Ice Be Declining?
- Climate Hustle Next Monday – One Night Only
- The Surface Temperature Record Is A Farce
- NASA – Doubling Sea Level Rise By Data Tampering
-
Join 1,961 other subscribers
Recent Comments
Lack of coal will kill a lot more children than too much coal.
The way the researchers would probably do it, you stuff a rat with a ton of coal and check its vitals.
They showed that cyclamates and saccharin were bad by stiffing a dry powder mixture of the two sweeteners down rats throats. The rats had problems, mostly ulcers (too dry). The dose was equivalent to 7,000 12 oz bottles of soda a day. Hmmm. You could also try to pour 84,000 oz (1312 gallons) into a rat (or a human) and show that they explode!