Camel Calculations

I ran Australian camel farts through my climate model and found that killing all the camels will prevent 0.000000 degrees of temperature rise over the next century.

Animals consume the same amount of carbon as they emit. Had Julia passed primary school, she probably would have been aware of this.

It is important to remember that we are dealing with some of the stupidest people who ever lived.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

26 Responses to Camel Calculations

  1. Me says:

    No Aussi camel but An yll wynde that blowth

  2. Sean Peake says:


  3. Al Gored says:

    I see why your calculation is wrong. You need to use the camelimate model (one hump version) and make the adjustments necessary to compensate for the rebound of the earth’s crust as well as Chinese soot sensitivity.

    Of course, if any CO2 is emitted in the process of eliminating camel pollution, all bets are off.

  4. SMS says:

    This is an opportunistic move by some smarter than average government worker. The camel population is out of control in Australia. Years ago they invaded/trampled a small community, hurting some of the inhabitants. The government made the decision to kill 5 or 10 thousand of the animals.

    Now we have some Australian bureaucrat taking advantage of this “thinning of the herd”.

  5. Me says:

    I guess Andy WeissDC can’t go on a post spree now to remove all my Ill wind comments in the recent comments section like he just did earlier. Did you see that trend? I did.

  6. Grumpy Grampy ;) says:

    It is biologically impossible for Camels to emit all the carbon they consume because they are actually a carbon sink just as all other animals are. The term Carbon Based life forms comes to mind. Anyhow it is not the camels that create the methane but the bacteria in their digestive tracts that leave methane as a byproduct of the digestive process.

  7. suyts says:

    Obviously, Julia, somewhere down the line is a product of stupidity breeding. The problem is, the more stupidity bred, the less stupidity is recognizable because of stupidity.

    • Grumpy Grampy ;) says:

      Now that was interesting!

    • suyts says:

      lol, I have to bring it out from time to time. I’ve read and re-read the laws of stupidity and can’t find enough flaws to invalidate the premise. Obviously, this is done on an economic bent, but valid, nonetheless.

      I’ve obliged myself to write a post on my blog about something else, (damned beer!) but, I think I’ll try to expand the Laws with some theories, corollaries, and axioms at some point.

    • Don’t forget natural selection, it’s operating all the time. See the Darwin Awards for concrete (ouch!) proof.

  8. This is the same kind of thinking as “Whale poo adds fertiliser to the oceans and stimulates plankton growth”. Adds fertiliser? Where did the whale poo come from, I ask in all innocence?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s