## Camel Calculations

I ran Australian camel farts through my climate model and found that killing all the camels will prevent 0.000000 degrees of temperature rise over the next century.

Animals consume the same amount of carbon as they emit. Had Julia passed primary school, she probably would have been aware of this.

It is important to remember that we are dealing with some of the stupidest people who ever lived.

http://www.geekosystem.com/australia-camels-farting/

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

### 26 Responses to Camel Calculations

1. Me says:

No Aussi camel but An yll wynde that blowth

2. Sean Peake says:

Hahahahahahahahahaha

3. P.J. says:

• Me says:

An yll wynde that blowth, camel style.:)

• Me says:

🙂

4. Al Gored says:

I see why your calculation is wrong. You need to use the camelimate model (one hump version) and make the adjustments necessary to compensate for the rebound of the earth’s crust as well as Chinese soot sensitivity.

Of course, if any CO2 is emitted in the process of eliminating camel pollution, all bets are off.

5. SMS says:

This is an opportunistic move by some smarter than average government worker. The camel population is out of control in Australia. Years ago they invaded/trampled a small community, hurting some of the inhabitants. The government made the decision to kill 5 or 10 thousand of the animals.

Now we have some Australian bureaucrat taking advantage of this “thinning of the herd”.

• Al Gored says:

Now they need a CO2 link to Cane Toads, I’m sure they can invent one this good.

• Me says:

probably not, they just like to lick those. It explains everything.

6. Me says:

I guess Andy WeissDC can’t go on a post spree now to remove all my Ill wind comments in the recent comments section like he just did earlier. Did you see that trend? I did.

7. Grumpy Grampy ;) says:

It is biologically impossible for Camels to emit all the carbon they consume because they are actually a carbon sink just as all other animals are. The term Carbon Based life forms comes to mind. Anyhow it is not the camels that create the methane but the bacteria in their digestive tracts that leave methane as a byproduct of the digestive process.

• dust to dust

• Grumpy Grampy ;) says:

The Circle of life? There can be no net increase in any natural substance just as there can be no net loss.

• Me says:

Matter cannot be created nor destroyed

• suyts says:

Once people come to realize this, we’ll see that there is nothing to fear from CO2 being emitted. But, there is an abject refusal to see this.

• Me says:

suyts, I guess some physists forgot that along the way.

• Me says:

physicist

• suyts says:

I’m not sure there are too many physicists involved in this question.

8. suyts says:

Obviously, Julia, somewhere down the line is a product of stupidity breeding. The problem is, the more stupidity bred, the less stupidity is recognizable because of stupidity.
(See the second THE BASIC LAW OF HUMAN STUPIDITY) http://wwwcsif.cs.ucdavis.edu/~leeey/stupidity/basic.htm

• Grumpy Grampy ;) says:

Now that was interesting!

• suyts says:

lol, I have to bring it out from time to time. I’ve read and re-read the laws of stupidity and can’t find enough flaws to invalidate the premise. Obviously, this is done on an economic bent, but valid, nonetheless.

I’ve obliged myself to write a post on my blog about something else, (damned beer!) but, I think I’ll try to expand the Laws with some theories, corollaries, and axioms at some point.

• Don’t forget natural selection, it’s operating all the time. See the Darwin Awards for concrete (ouch!) proof.
http://www.darwinawards.com/

• rw says:

Amazing stuff …

If only they hadn’t pulled that gal out of the polar bear pool at the Berlin Zoo … AGW would have been able to claim a serious contender.

• rw says:

Come to think of it … Is there a collective Darwin award? (A case of group de-selection)

• rw says:

I should have said, “For a case of group de-selection”.

9. This is the same kind of thinking as “Whale poo adds fertiliser to the oceans and stimulates plankton growth”. Adds fertiliser? Where did the whale poo come from, I ask in all innocence?