Almost As Hot As 1911, 1918, And 1936 – Must Be The CO2

100 years ago it was due to lack of CO2, but now it is due to CO2. The church of Gore decrees it.


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Almost As Hot As 1911, 1918, And 1936 – Must Be The CO2

  1. Lex says:

    What?! You don’t believe in the Church of Sata…Al gore?!

  2. Marty K says:

    It’s a crying shame that we can’t have any of the “We can change nature (mother nad human)” warmists participate in a standup debate. Unfortunately 235 years may be too long for a slapdown style revolution. People from all walks and beliefs unknowling think others should think as they do. Some also think that our dynamic climate had a static signature and that we can control the thermostat,
    Egad, when we get to this volitile state where talking points, based on narrow sighted views over-ride everything logical, human nature kicks in and ye ol “survival of the fittest” takes shape.
    Climatology is in it’s infancy and the many modelling’ inputs aren’t even close to being known, much less the known weighting to be applied.

    • gator69 says:

      According to AR4, table 2.11, the IPCC has a ‘low’ to ‘very low’ understanding of nearly 70% of climate forcings. And this same table shows they have a ‘high’ understanding of less than 7% (GHG’s), and I would argue they have a ‘medium’ understanding, at best, of GHGs. This ‘consensus’ is not nearly as ‘overwheling’ as we have been told.

  3. huishi says:


    If you get the chance, how about a few posts on the alarmists refusing to debate? I would love to see a live debate by Lord Christopher Monckton debate Al Gore on live TV, Now that would be “must see TV”.

  4. Dr. Killpatient says:

    As soon as the Aussie made the “medical diagnosis” comparison, I would have reminded him that 99 out of 100 “doctors” in the 1300’s would have thought skin cancer came from an imbalance of bodily humors…perhaps caused by a toad or a small dwarf living in the stomach.

  5. IAmDigitap says:

    What you have is a bunch of people claiming ever more heat in the atmosphere in form of infra red, but the infra-red telescopy field says not one word for multiple score of years about ‘rising infra-red destroying our viewing and here’s the analysis over time’

    you hear NOT ONE WORD from optical telescopy – the field that helped Einstein cement relativity’s place in history by measuring the bending of a beam of starlight by galactic gravitational bodies –

    not ONE WORD from the optical telescopy field which effectively holds up a microscope to the atmosphere’s heat distortion – remember the DEFINITION of HEAT on GAS is – what kids?
    it’s M.O.T.I.O.N.

    Not ONE WORD of increased atmospheric distortion, also known as ‘The Stars Twinkling Over Their Twink Heads’ also known scientifically of course as Atmospheric Scintillation-

    this Stars Twinkling is a D.I.R.E.C.T F.U.N.C.T.I.O.N. of the amount of heat in the atmosphere: if there’s more heat there HAS to BE more MOTION meaning more days per year when optical telescopes can’t function well enough to view.

    Why is it that not ONCE in the HISTORY of all this not ONE STUDENT or ONE PROFESSOR looking for that DEVASTATING PAPER, or that EASY A,

    has gone and simply gotten photos of sections of the sky through time, around the same date, showing the MANDATORY EVER CLIMBING ATMOSPHERIC DISTORTION as VIEWED THROUGH OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION?

    Because there IS no increased distortion because there IS no such thing as a G.H.G. Effect.

    Care to check up on me? No need to even crack a book still.

    There are assemblies built by people to flex the mirrors of telescopes to COMPENSATE for this ATMOSPHERIC MOTION created DISTORTION.

    Why is it that not ONE WORD has ever come out about how “our mirror flexing assemblies used to have to apply X, Y, Z, flex to the mirror overall to compensate during a period of time, for the HEAT DISORTION called Atmospheric Scintillation. Now though, the amount has risen as ATMOSPHERIC HEAT HAS INCREASED.”

    Because THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL ATMOSPHERIC HEAT or THEY WOULD ALL – the INFRA-RED telescopy field, the OPTICAL telescopy field, and the field of instrumentation where the people flex telescope mirrors to compensate for HEAT in the ATMOSPHERE –

    they’d ALL, be SCREAMING BLOODY MURDER about the impending doom due to balmy weather.

    There IS no such thing as A.N.Y. G.H.G. Effect or these fields WOULDN’T BE ABLE TO HIDE IT as manmade gases have RAGED ever upward through passing decade after decade.

  6. Gator says:

    I just realized that 1911, 1918, 1936 and 2010 were all years when the US had progressive presidents. Taft, Wilson, FDR and Obama. It must be all the hot air eminating from the Oval Office!

  7. Nasif Nahle says:


    Found myself into a muted phase. You’re quite correct on your observations so I think no one can refute your arguments!

  8. Interesting that the GHG hyothesis ONLY mentions the Outgoing Longwave Radiation (OLR)being absorbed and ‘heating’ at night. That is because there is 20 times this same frequency IR ENTERING during the day that is absorbed, never impacts the planet and therefore is COOLED by GHG, never warming the Earth. Ever notice sudden ‘cooling’ when a clouds shadow passes over you ?

    But the critical factor is that radiation is NOT work. To warm the Earth, or any object, is a function of intensity and TIME. If you have a 1000 watt heater it does not ‘warm’ you without an electrical current flow. How much it can warm you depends on how long it is operating. In the case of OLR this ‘lapse time’ is only 5 milliseconds for CO2 and only slightly longer for the kinetic spinoff energy in the surrounding Nitrogen and Oxygen atoms. The entire atmospheric OLR delay is mere seconds in the entire air column. This is turning centuries of established science on it’s head for the benefit of some crooked commodity market thieves.

  9. cleanwater2 says:

    It is very interesting to note that in-spite of the high temperatures there are far fewer deaths from the heat than in the passed. One obvious observation is that far more people both young and old have air conditioners. This has saved many lives .Now lets follow the dotes. More air conditioners need more electricity both day and night. I heard that many electric companies had the highest demand for the last 125 years. They needed large capacity backup. Solar and Wind would not help in this type of demand. Coal and Nuclear generation can meet this kind of fluctuation.
    We heard that the Sierra Club and and mayor bloomberg are starting a campaign to stop coal fired generators. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that the Sierra Club and bloomberg want to murder senior citizens by causing “electrical brown out and electric shortages and increased cost of electricity. People should be boycotting the Sierra Club who has already stopped construction of many coal fired power plants. There slogan is Kill senior Citizen and health hindered people. The US EPA is working hand in hand with these killers by setting impossible to meet standards for coal fired power plants that would cause unfordable costs for electricity.
    Dr. Nahle of Mexico university has proved again the work of Robert W. Wood(1909) that the “greenhouse gas effect “ does not exist. The whole Mann-made global warming is a political hoax and anyone that promotes the hoax including AL Gore should be arrested and charged with fraud.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s