In science, if you don’t like the data – simply throw it away and blame it on human interference in the climate.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
John on The Price Of Telling The Truth… Don Gaddes on Seven Year Drought Killed 40%… Bill Sokeland on NSIDC : Arctic Was Ice Free In… Notes To Ponder on 45 Years Since Paul Ehrlich Wa… gator69 on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… gator69 on Toto Has Moved! Menicholas on Toto Has Moved! Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Ed Darrell on Phil Jones Removing The 1940…
Deniers of the MWP.
But, but, but, treeometers and thermometers correlate!!! ……… except when they don’t.
Boy, if ever a blog title was spot-on….LOL
“Case closed” In their dreams maybe.
I’ve been vindicated, OJ Simpson October 3, 1995
Phil Plait is now openly getting his cues from PR site DeSmogBlog. How telling.
Criminals all.
Or as someone else said …
Crimatologists
He argues that there was nothing interesting about climategate. He’s probably right. In all fields of science the scientists mess with peer-review, adjust data, form back-scratching relationships, and generally make sure that the results go the way they want them to. That’s why they don’t find climategate interesting.
Those of us with somewhat more naive views were quite disappointed to find that all science, astronomy (how do you corrupt astronomy???) is just as bad as climate science.