Hansen : Hiding The Decline In Greenland

Jimmy has been a busy boy destroying the global temperature record. Before his latest tampering, the capital of Greenland had been cooling since the 1930s (red line below.) Hansen recently fixed that to produce a warming trend (blue line below.)

Jimmy performed his magic by heating up all post-1980 temperatures and cooling pre-1980 temperatures.

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis

If the present refuses to get warmer, then the past must become cooler.


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Hansen : Hiding The Decline In Greenland

  1. gator69 says:

    My countries Justice department is out threatening little girls, who dare open lemonade stands, and turning a blind eye to this gross fraud. The world is indeed upside down, like Hansen’s graph.

  2. Blade says:

    Several lukewarmies at lukewarmer central disagree! Particularly Mosher …


    Goddard is wrong about Hansen as I have pointed out many times. You are wrong to defend what we have seen in the mails. Anyone on the fence who can see that Goddard is wrong about data and that you are wrong about the mails, will probably stay right on the fence or lose interest altogether

    • So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.
      Revelation 3:16

    • miked1947 says:

      I do not consider them “Luke Warmers”! Delusional maybe, but anything but lukewarmer, especially when they go to great lengths to defend the indefensible.

    • Blade says:

      Mike, I hear ya brother, but I’m just using their terminology, Curry and Mosher that is. Also, at WUWT, Anthony has them stuffed into that category on the link list.

      We could also call them fence sitters, which begs the question: don’t those sharp pointy fence tops stuck in their posteriors hurt after a while?

      Maybe they find it enjoyable.

  3. “Lukewarmer” means you accept all the radiative physics as basically correct, give or take some small margin for errors. But Lukewarmers don’t unquestioningly accept all the speculative assertions that “feedbacks” will turn that beneficial warming (even if very slight) into dangerous levels of warming. In other words, there is no problem, nothing to see, move along…

  4. tckev says:

    You may be interested in Chiefio’s blog where he has analyzed anomalies in GHCN v1 vs V3 1990 to date. Its at –

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s