Our lukewarmist friends insist that Hansen’s data is good, and that I just don’t understand it. This is remarkable statement, given that Hansen radically changes the data all the time.
Apparently both versions are completely accurate. Iceland is a schizo kind of place – unlike Hansen who is right on top of the facts.
You’re trying to discriminate among data! Discrimination is evil! Every single version of every single datum is equally valid, unless you’re racist against certain numbers.
Lol, Hansen’s data is good…. all versions of it!!
It makes no difference if the old version showed cooling and the new version shows warming. Both versions are completely accurate, and both indicate that we are going to melt or drown very soon.
Luke warmers are a strange breed. You wonder why they engage at all. I view them as warmists but attempt to appear as level headed or something….. more like attention whores.
A bit like ‘moderate’ Republicans 🙂
O/T Looks like DMI have had another nasty accident with their graph:
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icecover.uk.php
Lukewarmers are their own worst enemy because no one agrees with them, even other so-called lukewarmers.