The two images below have a 1% difference in absorption of visible light. Can you tell which is which?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
John on The Price Of Telling The Truth… Don Gaddes on Seven Year Drought Killed 40%… Bill Sokeland on NSIDC : Arctic Was Ice Free In… Notes To Ponder on 45 Years Since Paul Ehrlich Wa… gator69 on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… gator69 on Toto Has Moved! Menicholas on Toto Has Moved! Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Ed Darrell on Phil Jones Removing The 1940…
I’m trying to figure out which is which, but I can’t see both at the same time clearly … one of my kids coloured on my LCD screen with blue pen :(.
Is the upper frame darker?
The upper frame is RGB(100,100,100) and the lower frame is RGB(99,99,99) so the lower frame is darker. RGB(0,0,0) is black. RGB(255,255,255) is white.
My incorrect guess makes your point exactly.
Does Hansen flip coins?
The difference between the two is about the difference in the amount of LW radiation due to CO2 in the tropics.
I can see your house from here…
There is almost no smoke today.
Yes.
I can’t see any difference, but our alarmist friends claim whatever difference there is will cause super duper exponential warming and a 200 m sea level rise, also destroy life as we know it on the planet.
Here’s the bottom image with a big “X” drawn on it in the color of the top image:
I can just barely see the “X”, but if you hadn’t said it was there, I wouldn’t have known.
Somebody left the lens cap on!
Gosh, it is easy to see which one is darker! It’s the burning hot one, the one that is murdering all the polar bears!