Fifteen years of no temperature rise, while government has spent hundreds of billions of dollars trying to scare us over a total non-event.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
- Toto Has Moved!
- Cooling Nuuk
- Escape The Heat At Your Local Movie Theater
- Charles Butler Interview – May 2, 2016
- Massive Greenland Fraud Is Rapidly Growing
- More Detail On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- 1995 IPCC Report Showed No Troposphere Warming From 1958 To 1995
- More On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- Climate Hustle Today
- On The Air Monday
- NOAA Quadrupling Radiosonde Temperatures By Data Tampering
- Skiing Is A Thing Of The Past
- Alarmist Brains Depleted Of Oxygen
- Climate Scam Being Driven By Politicians/Actors/Journalists
- 1905 : Valdez, Alaska Relocated Due To Glacial Melting
- Today’s Climate Fraud Winners – Science News
- Most Influential Climate Denier On Twitter
- SCIENCE : 230 Years Of Blaming White Men For Climate Change
- Battling Climate Misinformation In Santa Fe
- 1906 : Belief In Climate Change Is Due To Defective Memories
- Oswald’s Rifle?
- The Arctic Is Ice Free – How Can Sea Ice Be Declining?
- Climate Hustle Next Monday – One Night Only
- The Surface Temperature Record Is A Farce
- NASA – Doubling Sea Level Rise By Data Tampering
Recent Comments
John on The Price Of Telling The Truth… Don Gaddes on Seven Year Drought Killed 40%… Bill Sokeland on NSIDC : Arctic Was Ice Free In… Notes To Ponder on 45 Years Since Paul Ehrlich Wa… gator69 on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… gator69 on Toto Has Moved! Menicholas on Toto Has Moved! Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Ed Darrell on Phil Jones Removing The 1940…


AMS says of IPCC models, “The simulations rule out (at the 95% level) zero trends for intervals of 15 yr or more, suggesting that an observed absence of warming of this duration is needed to create a discrepancy with the expected present-day warming rate” and would then be falsified at the 95% level. Page 24 of this PDF
So the HansenSoft adding machine is broken then.
Using NCEP’s own data from the beginning of 2008 shows a jagged cooling beginning likely due to the -PDO, and soon by the end of the decade, the AMO will follow, and we’ll really get some cooling!!
Hi, Im French sorry for my English.
The AMO should follow the sun with a lag about 8 or 9 years, so i think between 2015-2020 AMO will be pass in cold mod.
PDO will be negative for 30 years now, and AMO will be negative from 2015-2020 to 2048, the solar will be quiet for 30-40 years too.
The next global cooling could looks like Dalton or Spörer minimums, if we have a big volcanic activity.
Nice comment. Your English is better than my French (i.e. I do not know French at all).
You know you are supposed to be using the much superior Hadcrut4 data now. You know, the one where they nearly removed the 1998 El Nino: http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4nh/from:1996/plot/hadcrut4nh/from:1996/trend
1998 never happened. Like the 1930s. The Ministry of Truth has removed it.
Exactly ! Hide the Decline ! This is like Hansen for the temperature peak of 1930-1940 is USA, Island …
The IPCC said climate is definite about 30 years ago, but if they take 60 years, the don’t see the cooling of 40-70’s and the Warning of 10-40’s ! There is a cycle of 60 years ago for the climate variability, more here:
http://www.appinsys.com/globalwarming/SixtyYearCycle.htm
Take a look at 30 years of data if some think 15 is too short:
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/last:360/plot/uah/last:360/plot/rss/last:360/plot/gistemp/last:360
At the current rate, assuming warming continues, we might see a 1C or so rise by 2100. (In other words, a global net benefit to the planet by that stage.)