Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
- Toto Has Moved!
- Cooling Nuuk
- Escape The Heat At Your Local Movie Theater
- Charles Butler Interview – May 2, 2016
- Massive Greenland Fraud Is Rapidly Growing
- More Detail On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- 1995 IPCC Report Showed No Troposphere Warming From 1958 To 1995
- More On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- Climate Hustle Today
- On The Air Monday
- NOAA Quadrupling Radiosonde Temperatures By Data Tampering
- Skiing Is A Thing Of The Past
- Alarmist Brains Depleted Of Oxygen
- Climate Scam Being Driven By Politicians/Actors/Journalists
- 1905 : Valdez, Alaska Relocated Due To Glacial Melting
- Today’s Climate Fraud Winners – Science News
- Most Influential Climate Denier On Twitter
- SCIENCE : 230 Years Of Blaming White Men For Climate Change
- Battling Climate Misinformation In Santa Fe
- 1906 : Belief In Climate Change Is Due To Defective Memories
- Oswald’s Rifle?
- The Arctic Is Ice Free – How Can Sea Ice Be Declining?
- Climate Hustle Next Monday – One Night Only
- The Surface Temperature Record Is A Farce
- NASA – Doubling Sea Level Rise By Data Tampering
-
Join 1,966 other followers
Recent Comments
daveburton on Gallup Poll Shows That Very Fe… daveburton on Will Yale Censor My Comme… daveburton on Gallup Poll Shows That Very Fe… John on The Price Of Telling The Truth… Don Gaddes on Seven Year Drought Killed 40%… Bill Sokeland on NSIDC : Arctic Was Ice Free In… Notes To Ponder on 45 Years Since Paul Ehrlich Wa… gator69 on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… gator69 on Toto Has Moved! Menicholas on Toto Has Moved!
Shock News : “FIRE and drought is threatening to create a new dust bowl in the US”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
🙂 who says history does’nt repeat?
There was no Dust Bowl according to the UCS. According to them drought, precipitation and floods have never been worse and that it’s a sure sign that man has caused extreme weather. This is what they claim in their latest graphic on extreme weather. Hidden in the “how we arrived at our graphic” that most people would never bother to read is a caveat that their analysis is based only on weather after 1950. The use of a limited amount of data, and the elimination of data that indicates past weather events that are more extreme than today, seems to be good enough science for the UCS who claims that this limited evidence is enough to tie extreme weather to man. Isn’t post-modern science wonderful? Remember when science was troublesome in that you were expected consider all data? Now with post-modern science wecan just pretend that past data doesn’t exist and voila we get the results we need to fit our agenda. 🙂
http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/07/chart-science-extreme-weather