Has The Freezing Point Of Water Changed?

I have found hundreds of news stories describing the melting of the Arctic between 1900 and 1940, as well as abundant evidence that Arctic ice expanded during the 1970s.

Unless the freezing point of water has changed, the earlier period must have been warmer. Yet when we look on Hansen’s graphs, it appears that the period from 1900 to 1940 was much colder than the 1970s.

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Analysis Graphs and Plots

It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong. Richard P. Feynman

Hansen shows 1912 as being one of the coldest years on record, but people who were living at the time saw a world which was completely different from Hansen’s fantasy graphs.

19 Mar 1912 – CHANGE IN CLIMATE. “GREEN CHRISTMASES.”

Advertisements

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to Has The Freezing Point Of Water Changed?

  1. David Appell says:

    News stories aren’t science. (Perhaps you need to spin faster.)

    • Right. All those news stories about the Holocaust were probably made up.

      • gator69 says:

        “An unexpected cold wave in July 920 sent the people of Baghdad back under their blankets, forcing them to leave their summertime roof beds and go back inside, according to a new study by Spanish researchers. The temperature dropped about 16 degrees F compared to average July temperatures, the study found. That was in 920; there’s no “1” in there.
        Arabic historians’ records chronicle life in Baghdad in the Middle Ages, and some of the reports mention the area’s climate. Now scientists have interpreted them for the first time, and found some surprising meteorological events in the areas now known as Iraq and Syria. It used to snow more often, with at least six snowfalls between 902 and 944. (There has been only one snowfall in Baghdad in modern times, on Jan. 11, 2008.) The Arabic historians also recounted droughts, floods, heavy rains and frost, not a common occurrence in the fertile crescent.
        The researchers, led by Fernando Domínguez-Castro in the physics department at the University of Extremadura, believe a couple volcanic eruptions in central America could have been to blame for the July 920 cold snap. During some of those nights, temperatures never rose above 64 degrees F — pretty cool for a Baghdad July.”

        http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-04/baghdad-used-get-more-snow-according-new-study-old-climate-records

        Wrongway Appell strikes again! 😉

      • David Appell says:

        That’s typical of your typical method of false equivalences. Some news stories of some Arctic observations of 100 years ago hardly compare to the broad, constant measurements of the satellite era. You need to spend more time reading the science and less time looking up ancient newspaper articles — in this arena they don’t prove anything of a scientific capacity.

      • David Appell says:

        A cold wave in Baghdad over 1000 years ago proves nothing about climate, of course. Using it here is pure propaganda.

      • David, the argument is:

        1. Extensive news reporting on droughts and heatwaves during this time period.
        2. Raw temp data consistent with (1)
        3. Various demonstrations of very unusual adjustments to raw data.

        There are multiple lines of evidence here. I.e., historical data + original measured data.

    • Otter says:

      Good thing you aren’t a reporter, then, ’cause you are OLD news.

  2. gofer says:

    Does the news stories “are not science” only apply to past stories or does the present stories such as those in the NY Times or LA Times count?

    • David Appell says:

      Of course news stories in the NYT or LAT are not science. They are journalism or opinion.

      You really don’t know the difference between a scientific journal and a newspaper??

      • Paul in Sweden says:

        With regards to CAGW is getting harder to tell the difference.
        .

      • What’s happened to our education system when an ‘academic’ dismisses historical information as ‘opinion’ ? It’s a very sad state of affairs when ignorant statements are made by individuals who are meant to be part of our education ‘elite’.

  3. gator69 says:

    “David Appell says:
    July 29, 2012 at 11:45 pm
    A cold wave in Baghdad over 1000 years ago proves nothing about climate, of course. Using it here is pure propaganda.”

    Right over his head, as usual…

  4. scizzorbill says:

    Here is yesterdays view of the cryosphere including Greenland: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/

  5. Has The Freezing Point Of Water Changed?

    David Appell says yes.

  6. Mindert Eiting says:

    Steven,
    Some time ago I made a comparison between GHCN stations dropped (died/disappeared) before 1992 and those that survived that year. You can compare regional results upto that year. Of course, you may take 1995 or another year, provided that you have enough stations for a comparison. My idea was a bit cynical, that data manipulation is less likely for dropped stations (let them rest in peace). I found big differences at high southern latitudes, especially the Antarctic. The differences were not only several degrees Celsius on average but also showed trends. Remember that during 1970-99 more than 9400 GHCN stations were dropped. Consider this as a tip to do survival analysis.

  7. Don Sutherland says:

    It should be noted that the blog post reaches an incorrect conclusion (that the 1970s were shown to be warmer in the Arctic than the warm period during the 1900-1940s timeframe on GISS), because it is using the wrong graph. The blog entry shows the global land and ocean anomalies. It does not show the Arctic anomalies from GISS. Those anomalies show the warm period in question. They also reveal that the current warmth exceeds the magnitude of that earlier warm period.

  8. Don Sutherland says:

    Final points:

    1. GISS is transparent. The data shows faster warming in the Arctic region than elsewhere.
    2. The blog entry reaches an incorrect conclusion. It makes a statement concerning the Arctic, but then uses the wrong graph (global land and sea anomalies not Arctic anomalies) as supporting evidence.

    • miked1947 says:

      GISS is very transperant:
      Q. If SATs cannot be measured, how are SAT maps created ?
      A. This can only be done with the help of computer models, the same models that are used to create the daily weather forecasts. We may start out the model with the few observed data that are available and fill in the rest with guesses (also called extrapolations) and then let the model run long enough so that the initial guesses no longer matter, but not too long in order to avoid that the inaccuracies of the model become relevant. This may be done starting from conditions from many years, so that the average (called a ‘climatology’) hopefully represents a typical map for the particular month or day of the year.

Leave a Reply to miked1947 Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s