NASA forgot to mention the fact that their fake meltdown was 99.999% bullshit.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
John on The Price Of Telling The Truth… Don Gaddes on Seven Year Drought Killed 40%… Bill Sokeland on NSIDC : Arctic Was Ice Free In… Notes To Ponder on 45 Years Since Paul Ehrlich Wa… gator69 on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… gator69 on Toto Has Moved! Menicholas on Toto Has Moved! Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Ed Darrell on Phil Jones Removing The 1940…
Off-Topic news tip …
That is the story at Cnet (there are many more all over the place). Continuing …
This is a really risky mission!
Steve, do you actually do all of this blog yourself? I actually think you have a roomful of about 5 guys in China working on this.
P.S. your biking is inspirational. after being off the bike due to a “fat break”, i just lost 25lbs. I’m heading out to do 25 miles now.
By this misplaced logic, a location’s having a snowstorm during the winter proves that any thaw that took place prior to the storm was “fake.” The satellite data showed a period where a substantial portion of Greenland experienced at least a period of melting. That cooler weather returned to parts of Greenland accompanied by snow does not mean that such a period of melting did not occur.
I love how the entire surface of Greenland’s melting status can be determined by a fuzzy webcam picture at a camp which is 10,551 ft above sea level and likely was part of the 3% that saw little melting during the period in question.
I can’t help it if you are dense or blind.
“I can’t help it if you are dense or blind.”
So you are shown to be wrong and all you can do is say ‘lalalala I’m not listening’
Care to address any of my actual posts? You still won’t correct your ‘Andrew’ blog post, so it’s like you not only welcome bad conclusions and bad thinking, you wear it as a badge of honor.
All that you have shown is that you aren’t very bright. 80% of the ice sheet is at high altitude like Summit Station
“All that you have shown is that you aren’t very bright. 80% of the ice sheet is at high altitude like Summit Station ”
Weather conditions are different at different points in spite of ‘similar’ elevation.
But since you claim 80% of greenland is as high as the summit station, I decided to look it up:
Doesn’t look like you are at all correct.
“All that you have shown is that you aren’t very bright. 80% of the ice sheet is at high altitude like Summit Station ”
So I guess by this logic Mt. Elbert in CO has exactly the same climate as Mt. Hood in Oregon. Oh wait…
I fly over the Greenland ice sheet on a regular basis. It is a flat, continuous sheet of ice with essentially no relief except near the edges. Your comparison is absurd.
Also, they’re not getting ‘buried’ in snow. They don’t look like they’ve been receiving that much precipitation over the last month. What you’re seeing is what gets blown around from somewhere else that probably fell a long time ago.
The summit did see some temps above freezing though over the last month:
http://www.summitcamp.org/status/weather/index?period=month
So it’s possible they also saw a little bit of melt.
The same argument was used about Arctic ice that was blown into the Barents Sea a couple of years ago, and Leftists asserted that it “melted.”
Wouldn’t hear anything else.
You didn’t have to advertise that you were a Leftist. You inability to be coherent is proof enough.
With reference to last month’s overblown scare of Greenland’s warmth –
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/07/25/97-of-greenland-says-that-nasa-is-fos/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18978483
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/greenland-melt.html
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/24/greenland-ice-melt-every-150-years-is-right-on-time/
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/07/24/nasa-lying-about-their-own-press-release/
It’s the alarmists who are making ridiculous claims about 2 hours of 35 degree temps. It is the alarmists making the claim of catastrophic melt. It is your side that needs to prove your case by doing more than regugitating fabricated data fed to you by agenda driven puppet masters.
The 10,000+ ft. Greenland Ice Cap covers most of Greenland, not 3% as you are implying. The one station at 10,000+ feet is more representative of Greenland than all the other stations not on the icecap. The Ice Cap is it what it is, 10,000+ feet over most of Greenland, regardless of the amount of alarmist misrepresentation.
And regardless of any evidence:
http://www.azimuthproject.org/azimuth/show/Greenland+ice+sheet
some parts of the ice sheet are above 10,000 ft. Most part not
Summit station is representing the > 10,000ft conditions. The coastal stations are not,. so far your point is valid.
The only flat thing seems to be the forehead of the blog owner
Most of the ice sheet is above 8,000 feet
“Most of the ice sheet is above 8,000 feet”
See that 2500m line? That looks like about 50% to me.
You might want to think about what you just wrote.
Hi Steven,
your last staement is a little bit off the one before:
“stevengoddard says: August 5, 2012 at 2:17 pm
All that you have shown is that you aren’t very bright. 80% of the ice sheet is at high altitude like Summit Station ”
## ###
So is it now 80% above 8000ft or is it “most if the ice sheet”.
(by the way 8000ft is not the same as summit station(area) )
It is really funny to see how you “refine” your statements.
Sorry if I exaggerated by a couple thousand feet, but you get my point.
According to Wikipeida, the mean elevation of the ice sheet is 7,005 feet. That is still an awful lot of ice.
Mean is not the same measure as we are considering. The ice sheet tails off quickly at the edge and skews the average down.
Good point, Steve.
The Greenie Alarmist Lefties. Only are happy to get their Arctic info from the WWF or Greenpeace.
Speaking of which I see the Greenpeace vessel Arctic Sunrise is in the Barents sea area. So they must be on a polar bear expedition. Probably want to catch a few more Polar bears for their next Greenpeace advertisement campaign. It appears the last polar bear they caught starved to death in London when they released it for filming. The next wandering scrounging hungry polar bears could be coming to your neighbour so watchout. Greenpeace could be releasing a Polar Bear in the Middle East next. Rumors have it probably Dubai. The Polar bear is expected to be filmed instantly melting in the sun there. So be warned. AGW/CC is a bitch. 🙂