Barack Obama has only four years to save the world. That is the stark assessment of Nasa scientist and leading climate expert Jim Hansen who last week warned only urgent action by the new president could halt the devastating climate change that now threatens Earth. Crucially, that action will have to be taken within Obama’s first administration, he added
President Obama ‘has four years to save Earth’ | Environment | The Observer
That was just another of the indefenseable , idiotic statements by one of the chief climate clowns of one of the numerous idiotic agencies of this administration.
http://www.chron.com/news/article/New-study-links-current-events-to-climate-change-3763029.php#photo-3285009
Nice beard…
Sheesh! Where does he get his nonsense from, the little voices in his head? (Mu)Barak Obama has around 4 months to save the world.
/sarc 🙂
If you guys think Romney even has a chance, you haven’t seen the latest polling data. Nate Silver accurately predicted the outcome of the 2008 election. He’s using updated formulas now:
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/
Obama has a 71% or greater chance of winning at this point.
whatever, ya bulls hitter!
Then maybe I’ll bookmark this for November of 2012 and remind you when Obama walks away with 290 to 310 electoral votes.
See above your comment here!
According to the most reasonable poll of LIKELY registered voters and not oversampled Democratic majority polls (with 9-11% more Democrats than Republicans in the sampling) as of August 4, 2012 Romney leads Obama 46-44 in Rasmussen. The polls showing a massive Obama edge, if you check the demographics involved in the poll, use a higher sampling base of Democrats. The end result is whatever the most people in the poll want to be the answer ends up being the answer: Imagine asking 90 5 year olds and 10 50 year olds if sugar is good for you. You’d get a 90% belief that sugar is good! Just like if you ask 40 Democrats and 25 Republicans who will win in November, you’ll always have Obama.
Most people predicted the outcome of the 2008 election, but I’m standing by my belief Romney will win this year and oust the hack after one term. All the climate crooks need to be stopped before they bilk Americans out of every last cent we have, and right now it isn’t much! Also, expecting a poll from the New York Times to NOT favor the Democratic candidate is like expecting James Hansen not to involve the end of the world as we know it in any climate debate.
Bottom line: There is no AGW, and Obama and Romney are closely contested. Should the figures continue of an anemic recovery and possible double-dip recession, Romney will defeat him. No amount of media bias can hide the price you pay at the gas tank, how much you are getting paid, your job prospects, your area businesses closing down all around you, and other factors that will drive higher turnout to give us hope by causing a change in who the President is come Jan 2013.
Also, I noticed you had nothing to say when presented with the information above that Hansen warned only four years existed before the planet would be catastrophically harmed or some such bunkum… what do you have to say about yet another failed Hansen prediction sir?
What a moron.