Anti-Science Paucity

Twitter / oakden_wolf: @ClimateDepot Keep quoting …

h/t to Marc Morano


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Anti-Science Paucity

  1. gator69 says:

    The Wolf who cried boy!

  2. u.k.(us) says:

    What does “paucity of support” have to do with science let alone anti-science, are we alluding to consensus again ?
    How’s that “campaign” been working out ?

  3. LLAP says:

    Steve: This is off-topic, but it seems Michael Mann is threatening to sue the National Review Online. Apparently, he didn’t like the fact that Mark Steyn called the Hockey-stick “fraudulant”:

  4. Owen says:

    I hope Mann sues NRO. He’ll get his ass kicked and his shoddy science will be exposed for the world to see.

    • gofer says:

      NRO’s Headline in their reply:

      AUGUST 22, 2012 1:15 P.M.

      Get Lost
      My response to Michael Mann.
      By Rich Lowry

      • Blade says:

        NRO’s Headline in their reply:

        AUGUST 22, 2012 1:15 P.M.

        Get Lost
        My response to Michael Mann.
        By Rich Lowry

        Well it sure looks like Rich Lowry is wearing his big-boy pants today, because he usually wears panties.

        I believe it when I see it. If I was Mark Steyn I wouldn’t count on full support from National Review. They are not the same as when Buckley was around.

        Having said that, Mark Steyn doesn’t need them anyway. He is fully capable of skinning Mann alive and maybe even crushing the rest of the entire AGW cabal in the process.

    • ozspeaksup says:

      WUWT has the lawyers response to mannboys latest tantrum..its good:-)

  5. rocknblues81 says:

    So they’re allowed to call anybody anything they like, but they can’t take criticism?

  6. geologyjim says:

    Ya gotta go to NRO and read the lawyers’ response to Mann – priceless.

    “Mann … is a public figure who would be required to prove by clear and convincing evidence that NRO published a provably false statement with actual malice”. … … “Dr. Mann could never meet such a daunting burden”.

    Heh, heh, heh.

    Sayonara, Mikey-san

  7. Shooter says:

    “Paucity of support” – I think I’ll use big words to make myself sound smarter, even though I know nothing about climate science!

    And how is Morano “anti-science”? What’s with all the shaming words? How exactly is skepticism anti-science?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s