Ten Months Since Peter Gleick Named Head Of AGU Ethics And Integrity

Fraudster, thief, liar and likely forger Peter Gleick, was named head of AGU ethics almost ten months ago.

AGU’s new task force on scientific ethics and integrity begins work

Peter Gleick Pacific Institute, Oakland, Calif., USA

AGU has established a new task force to review, evaluate, and update the Union’s policies on scientific misconduct and the process for investigating and responding to allegations of possible misconduct by AGU members.

AGU’s new task force on scientific ethics and integrity begins work

Advertisements

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Ten Months Since Peter Gleick Named Head Of AGU Ethics And Integrity

  1. omnologos says:

    BREAKING: AGU still determined to show climate scientists as crooks and liars…

    http://www.bishop-hill.net/blog/2012/9/16/legal-education-for-climate-scientists.html

    • NikFromNYC says:

      Dude, your web site is trying too hard to auto-size the columns such that in only two of seven iPhone browsers I tried was I able to read full paragraphs instead of oversized text with only 1-3 words per line. The white trim on your collar looks like the cord from iPhone ear buds, which adds an anti-social vibe to my first impression, too. You have two instead of one “About” pages, one about the blog and one about you, but the one about you has a date on it rather than your first name. The About you text suffers only one “red flag” in which the phrase “making use of his innate, gregarious sense of empathy” comes off as stiffly awkward verging on creepy. I want my engineering and spreadsheet guys in one room and not out flirting with the marketing babes. That you participate on a blog in which Google will show an overlap with OmaTumr.com being confused with OmniLogos, that takes guts, as Oliver, bless his weary heart, cockblocks instead of wings us.

  2. RobertvdL says:

    With people like this who needs foreign terrorists to bring down your/a country. If he just would be the only one.

  3. Peter Gleick represents well the AGU that deceived the public and world leaders with post-1945 BS – packaged as consensus science:

    http://judithcurry.com/2012/09/15/bs-detectors/
    http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/#comment-1075

    Here is AGU recorded history in corrupting government science to obscure energy (E) stored as mass (m) in cores of heavy atoms and stars:

    1. AGU began as part of the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) – the private, self-perpetuating group that exerts control by reviewing the budgets of various research agencies, like NSF, DOE, EPA, NASA, etc. for Congress.

    2. At the national AGU meeting in Washington, DC, in April 1956, the presentation on self-sustaining nuclear reactors in nature was dismissed as impossible by the chairman and publication of the paper [1] was denied via normal channels. Measurements by scientists from the French Atomic Energy Commission confirmed in 1972 the validity of Kuroda’s 1956 papers [2].

    In the abstract you will see AGU was trying to hide information on element synthesis.

    3. At the national AGU meeting in Washington, DC, in April 1976, our presentation on local synthesis of our elements in the Sun [3] was rescheduled after we arrived, the chairman of the session forgot to time the speakers, and a Harvard astrophysicists was inserted in the program to speak ahead of us on the injection of isotopic anomalies from a near-by supernova – a model already falsified by 1975 data [4]

    Yes, Dr. Peter Gleick represents well the role that AGU played in corrupting government science for the US National Academy of Sciences after the Second World War. Science magazine has removed the 1975 paper [4] with the original data from the Table of Contents and Author Index.

    References:

    1. P. K. Kuroda, “On the nuclear physical stability of the uranium minerals,” J. Chem. Physics 25, 781 (1956); “On the infinite multiplication constant and the age of the uranium minerals,” J. Chem. Physics 25, 1256 (1956).

    2. P. K. Kuroda, ”The Oklo phenomenon,” Naturwissenschaften 70, 536-539 (1983). http://www.springerlink.com/content/n556224311414604/

    3. “Elemental and isotopic inhomogeneities in noble gases: The case for local synthesis of the chemical elements”, Transactions Missouri Academy Sciences 9, 104-122 (1975); “Strange xenon, extinct super-heavy elements, and the solar neutrino puzzle”, Science 195, 208-210 (1977) http://tinyurl.com/ypxbk3

    4. R. S. Lewis, B. Srinivasan and E. Anders, “Host phase of a strange xenon component in Allende”, Science 190, 1251-1262 (1975) Now mysteriously removed from the Table of Contents and the Author Index of Science 26 December 1975, vol. 190 (#4221) pages 1249-1326 http://www.sciencemag.org/content/190/4221.toc http://www.sciencemag.org/content/190/4221/by/author

    With kind regards,
    Oliver K. Manuel
    Former NASA Principal
    Investigator for Apollo
    http://www.omatumr.com

  4. R. de Haan says:

    New book putting the current scam in a historic perspective “Merchants of Despair: Radical Environmentalists, Criminal Psuedo-Scientists and the Fatal Cult of Antihumanism”.
    http://climategate.nl/2012/09/16/robert-zubrin-vernietigt-merchants-of-doubt-met-tegenboek/

    Watch the interview by the Austrian AV Club and buy the book.

  5. Andy DC says:

    The foxes are now the self-proclaimed regulators of the chicken coop.

  6. gator69 says:

    They are running out of ‘experts’.

  7. daveburton says:

    There was a pretty good article about Gleick’s crimes in an unlikely place: The Atlantic, Feb. 21, 2012.

    For more detailed information see:
    http://fakegate.org/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s