Obama : 400 Terrorists With Rocket Launchers On 9/11 Was A Spontaneous Reaction To The Evil US Constitution

Obama assumes that all Americans are as spectacularly stupid as the ones who vote for him.

U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice blanketed the TV airways Sunday to reinforce the Obama administration’s position that the deadly violence at American outposts across the Middle East last week was the result of an anti-Muslim video — delivering her message on four morning talk shows.

“What sparked the violence was a very hateful video on the Internet,” Rice said on “Fox News Sunday.” “It was a reaction to a video that had nothing to do with the United States.”

That is why they attacked the US embassy on 9/11, because it had nothing to do with 9/11 or the United States.

She also repeated the administration’s message that the attacks, which started Tuesday in Egypt and spread to more the 20 U.S. posts in the region, were “spontaneous,” not planned or timed for the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks.

Ambassador Rice spends Sunday reinforcing White House position that Middle East violence was ‘spontaneous’ | Fox News

Libya says Obama is full of shit.

Libyan parliamentary speaker hints at military strike after consulate attack | World news | guardian.co.uk

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Obama : 400 Terrorists With Rocket Launchers On 9/11 Was A Spontaneous Reaction To The Evil US Constitution

  1. omnologos says:

    Will you do the next step and understand it’s got nothing to do with Islam either?

    This episode is a chapter in internal Libyan politics plus a bunch of copy-cats. It’s about power, a way to show who is the Qaeda reference in northern Africa (and therefore who isn’t), a way to force the Libyan government who they have to come to terms with.

    In the big scheme of things this should be called The Great Pan-Arab Civil War and the best way not to suffer from it is to stay away from Arab politics.

    After all apart from rare occasions it’s all been a slaughter of Arabs by Arabs, hence of Muslims by Muslims.

    The hope is that like in Algeria these tactics are self-defeating just like communism was.

    • Rosco says:

      The problem is Islam confuses peace with “I’ll cut you to pieces for committing blasphemy you infidel !@%^hole” – an innocent mistake of interpretation of English any non native speaker could make.

  2. Blade says:

    The big story that has been buried is that our embassy in Benghazi had zero security. Supposedly 4 *Libyans* were the detail, 2 inside, 2 outside. And possibly one American who was unarmed. The word is that our worthless SoS Hillary vetoed the normal detail from DSS for some idi0tic reason. This Libyan embassy was exactly the opposite of Baghdad when it should have been identical.

    This is what political correctness does, it gets people killed. There couldn’t be a better duplicate of Carter’esque stupidity.

    The 2nd buried story is the fact that there was a 50-strong team of Al-Qaeda jihadists that planted themselves into the crowd of Muslim crybaby movie demonstrators. This thing had nothing do with the movie or the Libyans.

    Without a human security detail there should have at least been “Aliens” style robotic sentry mini-guns to pick up the slack. We’ve had this for decades on ships as Phalanx CIWS. Al-Qaeda could send all they got, no sweat, keep ’em coming.

  3. kbray in california says:

    And now from The United Arab Emirates….

    Will Islam will produce the next person to radically change our world ?
    Could Tamakkan unearth UAE’s next Steve Jobs ?

    “…tonight’s seminar at Al Mamoura Auditorium in Abu Dhabi kicks off a new season of lectures and talks aimed at helping UAE nationals (United Arab Emirates) and expats get ahead with new ideas.”



    O.K. UAE. We’re waiting…

  4. NikFromNYC says:

    Reasonable security gossip: “Debka: We Start Where The Media Stop”:


  5. The whole, continuing parade of absolutely blatant lies by Obama is why I would prefer to see him impeached, as I would count that a sign of a truly healthy country. (For me, it started with the Rev. Wright episode, and was entirely clear to me from that alone, as I was already aware of the subornation of angry (racist) Black American activists — most notoriously and early, Muhammad Ali — by Muslim commiserators/propagandists). But the important point for me is the health of this country and individual freedom in the world, not the politics or strategies of Islam, either worldwide or in the Middle East and Mediterranean: Obama is not really a Muslim (he hasn’t the character to be anything, when it comes down to it), he merely had early — critical — formative years among Muslims and his essentially America-hating parents; but what explains the insanity of the Left (and especially the media), that buys his lies eagerly and completely, as a drowning man lunges at a rescue rope? It is mostly, I think, rebellion by the Left (the 2008 election was basically revenge against Bush), against the relentless dismissal of “liberals”, since the end of World War II, by “Hard Right” conservatives. (I put these words in quotes, because I don’t live by those definitions, and I consider them convenient but too often misdirecting and wrong-headed labels — I’m a verdammt Independent among barbarians on both sides.) I see World War III rising, from the ashes of World War II and the unreconstructed, unlearned-from hatreds at that time (with the Muslim lie added, that it is really about their religion, with hatreds going back 1,400 years, and based upon tribal hatreds much older than that — that is, at bottom, the essential, self-destructive lie of Islam, that it does not allow Muslims to live in the present, and for a better future). In short, Obama = rebellion (by a child, not an adult).

  6. Glacierman says:

    Obama is really easy to figure out and it is obvious what his adminstration’s tactics are. The problem is the press that carry his water. He would be down 20 points in the polls if they would just do their jobs. Opps, I meant do the job that the press is supposed to do, not their new jobs – promoting the left wing cause world wide, 24-7-365.

  7. jimash1 says:

    ““What sparked the violence was a very hateful video on the Internet,” Rice said on “Fox News Sunday.” “It was a reaction to a video that had nothing to do with the United States.””

    Really? His foreign policy has been so successful that the balance of peace has been overturned by a YouTube video! Really? That’s her position?

  8. bilejones says:

    So, let’s get this straight, The US government spent months murdering people in Libya last year with Hillary Clinton cackling, mocking and applauding and now people are shocked and horrified that some Libyan’s kill Clinton’s chief tool in the Country?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s