Sandy Proves Hansen Was Correct

Alarmists are again proving their infinite stupidity.

Ouch! Warming denialists’ claims blown away by Sandy « Millard Fillmore’s Bathtub

I had a fever of 103F for a few hours when I was a child. That proves that 103F is the new normal body temperature.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Sandy Proves Hansen Was Correct

  1. Dave N says:

    I was considering making a comment about the West Side Highway being underwater as a lame joke, since it’s obviously temporary. Moreover, the alarmist morons don’t see the point that even in 6 years it isn’t going to be permanently underwater, and they throw in a couple of strawmen for good measure.

    Is “tonylearns” Tony Duncan? Ironic that the username ends with “learns”, because he obviously hasn’t.

  2. kim2ooo says:

    And the guy in the picture is swimming 🙂

    • Dave N says:

      Alarmists will likely counter with something even more stupid, like:

      “this isn’t a single data point” or “this, taken with other evidence…” etc.

      They remain curiously silent when reminded of events like Hazel, Long Island Express etc. It’s obvious they’ve swallowed their own (or the media’s) tripe about it supposedly being the “worst”. As per usual, they have no concept of history.

  3. Pathway says:

    Lake Powell rose a few feet? In 2011 Lake Powell stored more the 2,500,000 new acre feet of water.

  4. Tony Duncan’s looking for an apology.

  5. Martin C says:

    FYI, I just posted the following comment to the article:

    Holy cow, you’re going use a storm surge as ‘proof’ that Hansen was
    right. How idiotic can you be?

    Any logical person reading Hansen’s claim would clearly state that he
    expected the NORMAL SEA LEVEL to be flooding the west side highway.

    Ridiculous doesn’t even begin to describe this article . .

    There are only 4 comments, I wonder if mine will get past moderation . . . .

  6. gator69 says:

    So would this then mean that snow in Chicago is proof of a new ice age? Kind of makes mitigation planning difficult, when each weather event means a new climate epoch.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s