The party of free love and sexual liberation has now declared sex and love letters to be crimes, in order to protect their messiah.
It is part of their eugenics program, they do not want people who can think on their own reproducing.
“Free love and sexual liberation??” Really, are you still hung up on the ’60s?
Toshinmack, ya know a flower has to bloom before the Appell appears! 😆
Obama was bragging about sexually liberating the Army just last week, right before he made sex illegal for Army generals.
What did he brag?
What law makes sex illegal for Army generals?
Earnest people don’t tend to have much of a sense of humour. Sarcasm is beyond them.
I have a fine sense of humor. That’s why I find trying to refight the 1960s, for nothing more than an infinitesimal political point, absolutely hilarious.
I see toshinmack isn’t very good at that reporting thinggy either, his left side has no use fer his right side, he should have it surgically removed……. 😆
David, I’ve seen no evidence you can tell which posts are intended to be serious and which are meant to lampoon.
That says a lot about you.
Yup Toshinmack it does say allot about you….
DOH … gays in the military ….. DOH
“One result is that Petraeus could possibly face military prosecution for adultery if officials turn up any evidence to counter his apparent claims that the affair began after he left the military.”
Obama didn’t make that (military) law….
Amazing coincidence that the first application of the law came up right before the Benghazi hearings, and made it impossible for him to testify.
The most transparent case of blackmail I have ever heard of.
That is probably his reasoning fer you didn’t build that, so the responsibility won’t lay at his feet.
So you are a conspiracy nut?
PS: Why don’t you use your real name here? What are you afraid of?
I see that you continue to have your head firmly planted up your rear.
Why are you afraid to use your real name on your blog postings?
Why are you afraid to discuss data tampering at USHCN?
I feel sorry for you, afraid to put our name to your opinions for fear of losing your job. That doesn’t strike me as worth it (and is one reason I left the corporate world). Lying just isn’t worth it.
Your constant diversions and attempts to change the subject are really annoying.
Really — what are you afraid of? That they’ll find you’re a climate denier and fire you?
You complain about Obama, yet you have yoked your own freedom to your corporate masters.
Ha. Of course, spam and your real name have no correlation.
Seriously, don’t you find it limiting to have to hide your identity, your opinions, for the sake of a job? (And a job in the defense industry, to boot?) Don’t you feel… well, less free? Yoked? Bought? Owned?
This is a big reason why I work for myself.
PS: Do you really think your IP address is completely protected in the Gmail messages you have sent me?
Yes; I realize by now you are afraid to reveal your identity.
Kinda gives the word “denier” a whole new meaning, doesn’t it?
I see your most recent blog post is about electronic privacy violations. ROFLMAO
You must live in fear of being discovered. That can’t be healthy….
Are you drunk?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Real Science
Simply answer: what are you afraid of?
I’m afraid to ride my bicycle in traffic. I’m afraid that the US is going to hell in a hand basket. I’m afraid that Manchester United will win the Premiership.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Real Science
You’re afraid to say who you are. Sad.
I have written huge amounts of information about who I am. I have even provided my pen name.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Real Science
All but your name. Sad. All your work, from a coward.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Real Science
I don’t see what’s so funny. You’re not brave enough to put your name to your ideas. That, to me, is the very definition of a coward.
Good for you.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Real Science
And bad for you.
The reason you never discuss actual data is because you are a coward.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Real Science
By now, “Steve,” I have your number: a blowhard who is afraid to stand behind his opinions. Cowed by his corporation.
Any clown can put up an anonymous blog. But the world needs men who want to make a difference.
Why are you afraid to delve into the USHCN “adjustments”? Perhaps you are afraid that looking at actual numbers would injure your belief system?
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Real Science
I hope you find your balls sometime soon….
I think it is hilarious that you post indignation on your blog about improper electronic surveillance, and then come over here and claim to be doing it to me. Typical lib.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Real Science
Grow some balls, “Steve.” Stop hiding.
Appell you are a Jackass just like that half breed usurper –and i am not afraid to use my name–i used to deliver tune ups to people like you
Don’t be like that, you are playing into his game.
Unless that’s what what your intentions here is to do?
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Google+ account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Twitter account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Facebook account.
( Log Out /
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 1,929 other followers